Nonautonomous superposition operators in the spaces of functions of bounded variation (Q526144): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Importer (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / author
 
Property / author: Daria Bbugajewska / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / review text
 
The superposition operator (also called composition operator or Nemytskij operator) \(F(x)(t)= f(t,x(t))\) generated by a function \(f: [0,1]\times\mathbb{R}\) has, in spite of its simple form, a rather pathological behaviour in many function spaces, and many problems concerning its properties are still open. For example, it was a long-standing problem to find conditions on \(f\), possibly both necessary and sufficient, under which the operator \(F\) maps the space BV\([0,1]\) into itself. An apparently obvious sufficient condition given by Lyamin in 1986 turned out to be incorrect, as was observed by the first author in 2010 [Math. Comput. Modelling 52, No. 5--6, 791--796 (2010; Zbl 1202.45005)], see also [the reviewer et al., Commun. Appl. Anal. 15, No. 2--4, 153--182 (2011; Zbl 1255.47059)] and confirmed by means of a counterexample by the fourth author [Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 142, No. 5, 1773--1776 (2014; Zbl 1285.47071)]. In this article, which is both a survey of known and a research paper with new results, the authors solve the mentioned problem by giving a necessary and sufficient condition on \(f\) (too technical to be reproduced here) under which \(F\) maps BV\([0,1]\) into itself and is locally bounded. The last additional property is not a severe restriction, since the authors also show that local boundedness of \(F\) implies local boundedness of \(f\), and functions \(f\) which are not locally bounded usually occur very seldom in applications. Apart from the solution of the mentioned problem, the authors also give other interesting and important contributions to the theory of superposition operators in BV-spaces. For instance, several results are given for functions of the form \(f(t,u)= g(t)h(u)\) which are in a certain sense ``intermediate'' between the autonomous case \(f=f(u)\) and the nonautonomous case \(f=f(t,u)\). A~strong positive feature of this nice paper is that the authors illustrate their abstract results throughout by illuminating examples and counterexamples.
Property / review text: The superposition operator (also called composition operator or Nemytskij operator) \(F(x)(t)= f(t,x(t))\) generated by a function \(f: [0,1]\times\mathbb{R}\) has, in spite of its simple form, a rather pathological behaviour in many function spaces, and many problems concerning its properties are still open. For example, it was a long-standing problem to find conditions on \(f\), possibly both necessary and sufficient, under which the operator \(F\) maps the space BV\([0,1]\) into itself. An apparently obvious sufficient condition given by Lyamin in 1986 turned out to be incorrect, as was observed by the first author in 2010 [Math. Comput. Modelling 52, No. 5--6, 791--796 (2010; Zbl 1202.45005)], see also [the reviewer et al., Commun. Appl. Anal. 15, No. 2--4, 153--182 (2011; Zbl 1255.47059)] and confirmed by means of a counterexample by the fourth author [Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 142, No. 5, 1773--1776 (2014; Zbl 1285.47071)]. In this article, which is both a survey of known and a research paper with new results, the authors solve the mentioned problem by giving a necessary and sufficient condition on \(f\) (too technical to be reproduced here) under which \(F\) maps BV\([0,1]\) into itself and is locally bounded. The last additional property is not a severe restriction, since the authors also show that local boundedness of \(F\) implies local boundedness of \(f\), and functions \(f\) which are not locally bounded usually occur very seldom in applications. Apart from the solution of the mentioned problem, the authors also give other interesting and important contributions to the theory of superposition operators in BV-spaces. For instance, several results are given for functions of the form \(f(t,u)= g(t)h(u)\) which are in a certain sense ``intermediate'' between the autonomous case \(f=f(u)\) and the nonautonomous case \(f=f(t,u)\). A~strong positive feature of this nice paper is that the authors illustrate their abstract results throughout by illuminating examples and counterexamples. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Jürgen Appell / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 47H30 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 26A45 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 45G10 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 47-02 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH DE Number
 
Property / zbMATH DE Number: 6712737 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
acting conditions
Property / zbMATH Keywords: acting conditions / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
autonomous (nonautonomous) superposition operator
Property / zbMATH Keywords: autonomous (nonautonomous) superposition operator / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
Lipschitz condition
Property / zbMATH Keywords: Lipschitz condition / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
locally bounded mapping
Property / zbMATH Keywords: locally bounded mapping / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
variation in the sense of Jordan
Property / zbMATH Keywords: variation in the sense of Jordan / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 06:40, 1 July 2023

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Nonautonomous superposition operators in the spaces of functions of bounded variation
scientific article

    Statements

    Nonautonomous superposition operators in the spaces of functions of bounded variation (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    8 May 2017
    0 references
    The superposition operator (also called composition operator or Nemytskij operator) \(F(x)(t)= f(t,x(t))\) generated by a function \(f: [0,1]\times\mathbb{R}\) has, in spite of its simple form, a rather pathological behaviour in many function spaces, and many problems concerning its properties are still open. For example, it was a long-standing problem to find conditions on \(f\), possibly both necessary and sufficient, under which the operator \(F\) maps the space BV\([0,1]\) into itself. An apparently obvious sufficient condition given by Lyamin in 1986 turned out to be incorrect, as was observed by the first author in 2010 [Math. Comput. Modelling 52, No. 5--6, 791--796 (2010; Zbl 1202.45005)], see also [the reviewer et al., Commun. Appl. Anal. 15, No. 2--4, 153--182 (2011; Zbl 1255.47059)] and confirmed by means of a counterexample by the fourth author [Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 142, No. 5, 1773--1776 (2014; Zbl 1285.47071)]. In this article, which is both a survey of known and a research paper with new results, the authors solve the mentioned problem by giving a necessary and sufficient condition on \(f\) (too technical to be reproduced here) under which \(F\) maps BV\([0,1]\) into itself and is locally bounded. The last additional property is not a severe restriction, since the authors also show that local boundedness of \(F\) implies local boundedness of \(f\), and functions \(f\) which are not locally bounded usually occur very seldom in applications. Apart from the solution of the mentioned problem, the authors also give other interesting and important contributions to the theory of superposition operators in BV-spaces. For instance, several results are given for functions of the form \(f(t,u)= g(t)h(u)\) which are in a certain sense ``intermediate'' between the autonomous case \(f=f(u)\) and the nonautonomous case \(f=f(t,u)\). A~strong positive feature of this nice paper is that the authors illustrate their abstract results throughout by illuminating examples and counterexamples.
    0 references
    acting conditions
    0 references
    autonomous (nonautonomous) superposition operator
    0 references
    Lipschitz condition
    0 references
    locally bounded mapping
    0 references
    variation in the sense of Jordan
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references