A note on meromorphic functions that share a set with their derivatives (Q539993): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Created a new Item |
Changed an Item |
||
Property / review text | |||
For a non-constant meromorphic function \(f\) and a set \(S\) of complex numbers, let \(E(S,f)=\bigcup_{a\in S}\{(z, p_z): f(z)-a=0\}\), where \(p_z\) is the multiplicity of the \(a\)-point \(z\). \textit{J. Chang}, \textit{M. Fang} and \textit{L. Zalcman} [Arch. Math. 89, No. 6, 561--569 (2007; Zbl 1148.30012)] proved the following theorem: Let \(f\) be a non-constant entire function and let \(S=\{a,b,c\}\), where \(a\), \(b\) and \(c\) are distinct complex numbers. If \(E(S,f)=E(S,f')\), then either (i) \(f(z)=Ce^z\); or (ii) \(f(z)=Ce^{-z}+\frac23 (a+b+c)\) and \((2a-b-c)(2b-c-a)(2c-a-b)=0\); or (iii) \(f(z)=Ce^{\frac{1\pm i\sqrt{3}}{6}z}+\frac{3\pm i\sqrt{3}}{6}(a+b+c)\) and \(a^2+b^2+c^2-ab-bc-ac=0\), where \(C\) is a nonzero constant. In [J. Math. Anal. Appl. 338, No. 2, 1020--1028 (2008; Zbl 1160.30014)], \textit{J. Chang} and \textit{L. Zalcman} proved that the same is true for non-constant meromorphic function with at most finitely many simple poles, provided that \(c=0\). The author proves that the conclusion of the theorem holds for an arbitrary transcendental meromorphic function with at most finitely many poles. The case when \(f\) is rational remains open. | |||
Property / review text: For a non-constant meromorphic function \(f\) and a set \(S\) of complex numbers, let \(E(S,f)=\bigcup_{a\in S}\{(z, p_z): f(z)-a=0\}\), where \(p_z\) is the multiplicity of the \(a\)-point \(z\). \textit{J. Chang}, \textit{M. Fang} and \textit{L. Zalcman} [Arch. Math. 89, No. 6, 561--569 (2007; Zbl 1148.30012)] proved the following theorem: Let \(f\) be a non-constant entire function and let \(S=\{a,b,c\}\), where \(a\), \(b\) and \(c\) are distinct complex numbers. If \(E(S,f)=E(S,f')\), then either (i) \(f(z)=Ce^z\); or (ii) \(f(z)=Ce^{-z}+\frac23 (a+b+c)\) and \((2a-b-c)(2b-c-a)(2c-a-b)=0\); or (iii) \(f(z)=Ce^{\frac{1\pm i\sqrt{3}}{6}z}+\frac{3\pm i\sqrt{3}}{6}(a+b+c)\) and \(a^2+b^2+c^2-ab-bc-ac=0\), where \(C\) is a nonzero constant. In [J. Math. Anal. Appl. 338, No. 2, 1020--1028 (2008; Zbl 1160.30014)], \textit{J. Chang} and \textit{L. Zalcman} proved that the same is true for non-constant meromorphic function with at most finitely many simple poles, provided that \(c=0\). The author proves that the conclusion of the theorem holds for an arbitrary transcendental meromorphic function with at most finitely many poles. The case when \(f\) is rational remains open. / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / reviewed by | |||
Property / reviewed by: I. E. Chyzhykov / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 30D35 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 30D45 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH DE Number | |||
Property / zbMATH DE Number: 5902954 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
meromorphic function | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: meromorphic function / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
Nevanlinna theory | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: Nevanlinna theory / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
normal family | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: normal family / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
differential polynomial | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: differential polynomial / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
uniqueness set | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: uniqueness set / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 10:58, 1 July 2023
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | A note on meromorphic functions that share a set with their derivatives |
scientific article |
Statements
A note on meromorphic functions that share a set with their derivatives (English)
0 references
1 June 2011
0 references
For a non-constant meromorphic function \(f\) and a set \(S\) of complex numbers, let \(E(S,f)=\bigcup_{a\in S}\{(z, p_z): f(z)-a=0\}\), where \(p_z\) is the multiplicity of the \(a\)-point \(z\). \textit{J. Chang}, \textit{M. Fang} and \textit{L. Zalcman} [Arch. Math. 89, No. 6, 561--569 (2007; Zbl 1148.30012)] proved the following theorem: Let \(f\) be a non-constant entire function and let \(S=\{a,b,c\}\), where \(a\), \(b\) and \(c\) are distinct complex numbers. If \(E(S,f)=E(S,f')\), then either (i) \(f(z)=Ce^z\); or (ii) \(f(z)=Ce^{-z}+\frac23 (a+b+c)\) and \((2a-b-c)(2b-c-a)(2c-a-b)=0\); or (iii) \(f(z)=Ce^{\frac{1\pm i\sqrt{3}}{6}z}+\frac{3\pm i\sqrt{3}}{6}(a+b+c)\) and \(a^2+b^2+c^2-ab-bc-ac=0\), where \(C\) is a nonzero constant. In [J. Math. Anal. Appl. 338, No. 2, 1020--1028 (2008; Zbl 1160.30014)], \textit{J. Chang} and \textit{L. Zalcman} proved that the same is true for non-constant meromorphic function with at most finitely many simple poles, provided that \(c=0\). The author proves that the conclusion of the theorem holds for an arbitrary transcendental meromorphic function with at most finitely many poles. The case when \(f\) is rational remains open.
0 references
meromorphic function
0 references
Nevanlinna theory
0 references
normal family
0 references
differential polynomial
0 references
uniqueness set
0 references