Ideal point discriminant analysis (Q578808): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Created a new Item |
Changed an Item |
||
Property / author | |||
Property / author: Yoshio Takane / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / review text | |||
A new method of multiple discriminant analysis was developed that allows a mixture of continuous and discrete predictors. The method can be justified under a wide class of distributional assumptions on the predictor variables. The method can also handle three different sampling situations, conditional, joint and separate. In this method both subjects (cases or any other sampling units) and criterion groups are represented as points in a multidimensional euclidean space. The probability of a particular subject belonging to a particular criterion group is stated as a decreasing function of the distance between the corresponding points. A maximum likelihood estimation procedure was developed and implemented in the form of a FORTRAN program. Detailed analysis of two real data sets were reported to demonstrate various advantages of the proposed method. These advantages mostly derive from model evaluation capabilities based on the Akaike information criterion (AIC). | |||
Property / review text: A new method of multiple discriminant analysis was developed that allows a mixture of continuous and discrete predictors. The method can be justified under a wide class of distributional assumptions on the predictor variables. The method can also handle three different sampling situations, conditional, joint and separate. In this method both subjects (cases or any other sampling units) and criterion groups are represented as points in a multidimensional euclidean space. The probability of a particular subject belonging to a particular criterion group is stated as a decreasing function of the distance between the corresponding points. A maximum likelihood estimation procedure was developed and implemented in the form of a FORTRAN program. Detailed analysis of two real data sets were reported to demonstrate various advantages of the proposed method. These advantages mostly derive from model evaluation capabilities based on the Akaike information criterion (AIC). / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 62H30 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH DE Number | |||
Property / zbMATH DE Number: 4013778 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
ideal point discriminant analysis | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: ideal point discriminant analysis / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
multiple discriminant analysis | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: multiple discriminant analysis / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
mixture of continuous and discrete predictors | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: mixture of continuous and discrete predictors / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
conditional | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: conditional / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
joint | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: joint / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
separate | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: separate / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
maximum likelihood estimation procedure | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: maximum likelihood estimation procedure / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
Akaike information criterion | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: Akaike information criterion / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 17:17, 1 July 2023
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Ideal point discriminant analysis |
scientific article |
Statements
Ideal point discriminant analysis (English)
0 references
1987
0 references
A new method of multiple discriminant analysis was developed that allows a mixture of continuous and discrete predictors. The method can be justified under a wide class of distributional assumptions on the predictor variables. The method can also handle three different sampling situations, conditional, joint and separate. In this method both subjects (cases or any other sampling units) and criterion groups are represented as points in a multidimensional euclidean space. The probability of a particular subject belonging to a particular criterion group is stated as a decreasing function of the distance between the corresponding points. A maximum likelihood estimation procedure was developed and implemented in the form of a FORTRAN program. Detailed analysis of two real data sets were reported to demonstrate various advantages of the proposed method. These advantages mostly derive from model evaluation capabilities based on the Akaike information criterion (AIC).
0 references
ideal point discriminant analysis
0 references
multiple discriminant analysis
0 references
mixture of continuous and discrete predictors
0 references
conditional
0 references
joint
0 references
separate
0 references
maximum likelihood estimation procedure
0 references
Akaike information criterion
0 references