Design by example: An application of Armstrong relations (Q579962): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Changed an Item |
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q61450086, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1704699890056 |
||
Property / Wikidata QID | |||
Property / Wikidata QID: Q61450086 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 08:45, 8 January 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Design by example: An application of Armstrong relations |
scientific article |
Statements
Design by example: An application of Armstrong relations (English)
0 references
1986
0 references
Example relations, and especially Armstrong relations, can be used as user friendly representations of dependency sets. In this paper we analyze the use of Armstrong relations in database design with functional dependencies, and show how they and the usual representation of dependencies can be used together. Special attention is given to the size of Armstrong relations. We derive new bounds for the size of minimal Armstrong relations for normalized schemes. Specifically, any relation scheme in Boyce-Codd Normal Form has an Armstrong relation whose size is roughly the product of the lengths of the keys for the scheme. New algorithms are also given for generating Armstrong relations and for inferring the functional dependencies holding in a relation.
0 references
relational database
0 references
Armstrong relations
0 references
representations of dependency sets
0 references
database design
0 references
functional dependencies
0 references
Boyce-Codd Normal Form
0 references