Hopf bifurcation for two types of Liénard systems (Q550011): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Added link to MaRDI item.
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Revision as of 07:57, 30 January 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Hopf bifurcation for two types of Liénard systems
scientific article

    Statements

    Hopf bifurcation for two types of Liénard systems (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    19 July 2011
    0 references
    Consider the Liénard system \[ \dot x= y- F(x),\quad \dot y= -x(x+ 1).\tag{\(*\)} \] In the case \[ F(x)= {\sum^n_{i=0} a_ix^i\over 1+\sum^m_{i=1} b_i x^i} \] the system \((*)\) has the equilibrium \(E(0,a_0)\), and the following result is proved. Theorem 1. The maximum number of limit cycles of the system \((*)\) near \(E(0,a_0)\) is not larger than \([{4n+2m-4\over 3}]- [{n-m\over 3}]\) for \(n\geq m\), and not larger than \([{4m+2n-4\over 3}]- [{m-n\over 3}]\) for \(m> n\). In the case \[ F(x)\begin{cases} \sum^n_{i=1} a^+_i x^i\quad &\text{for }x> 0,\\ \sum^n_{i=1} a^-_i x^i\quad &\text{for }x\leq 0,\end{cases} \] the system \((*)\) has the origin as equilibrium, and the authors prove the following result: Theorem 2. The Hopf cyclicity of the origin of the system \((*)\) is \([{3m+2n-1\over 3}]\) for \(m\geq n\) and \([{3n+2m-1\over 3}]\) for \(n> m\).
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    Liénard equation
    0 references
    limit cycle
    0 references
    Hopf bifurcation
    0 references