Small cancellation theory and automatic groups (Q750615): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Added link to MaRDI item.
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Revision as of 10:26, 30 January 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Small cancellation theory and automatic groups
scientific article

    Statements

    Small cancellation theory and automatic groups (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1990
    0 references
    Let G be a group with generating set X, and let \(\Gamma\) be the Cayley graph of G with respect to X. We can regard \(\Gamma\) as a metric space by giving each edge unit length. We can then consider imposing conditions on this metric space. The most well-known example of this is the hyperbolicity condition imposed by \textit{M. Gromov} [in: Essays in Group Theory, Publ., Math. Sci. Res. Inst. 8, 75-263 (1987; Zbl 0634.20015)]. Another condition is the automaticity condition. This requires a constant \(k>0\) and a path in the Cayley graph for each \(g\in G\) (starting at 1 and ending at g) such that paths which end a distance 1 apart stay within a distance k of each other, and such that the words defined by the paths constitute a regular language in the free monoid on \(X\cup X^{-1}\). As the authors show, hyperbolic groups are automatic. The main aim of this wide-ranging paper is to show that if G is given by a finite presentation satisfying the small cancellation conditions C(p), T(q) \(((p,q)=(6,3),(4,4),(3,6))\), and if all pieces have length 1 and no relator is a proper power, then G is automatic. In addition, the authors give some new examples of groups satisfying the C(3), T(6) conditions (for other examples see \textit{M. El-Mosalamy} and \textit{S. J. Pride} [Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 102, 443-451 (1987; Zbl 0654.20032)]; \textit{M. Edjvet} and \textit{J. Howie} [Proc. Lond. Math. Soc., III. Ser. 57, 301-328 (1988; Zbl 0627.20020)]; \textit{J. Howie} [Forum Math. 1, 251-272 (1989; Zbl 0676.20018)]). These examples are groups of isometries of certain Bruhat-Tits buildings. The groups are of cohomological dimension 2 (being torsion-free small cancellation groups), and neither they nor their subgroups of finite index can act on a tree without fixing a point (this follows from the fact that the groups have Kazhdan's property T). (For other examples of finitely presented groups of cohomological dimension 2 with no non-trivial action on a tree, see \textit{S. J. Pride} [J. Pure Appl. Algebra 29, 167-168 (1983; Zbl 0513.20019)].) In an appendix to the paper the authors give a proof of the ``if'' part of the following characterization of hyperbolic groups due to Gromov: A group is hyperbolic if and only if it is finitely presented and satisfies a linear isoperimetric inequality.
    0 references
    0 references
    Cayley graphs
    0 references
    hyperbolicity condition
    0 references
    automaticity condition
    0 references
    words
    0 references
    hyperbolic groups
    0 references
    finite presentations
    0 references
    small cancellation conditions
    0 references
    relators
    0 references
    groups of isometries
    0 references
    Bruhat-Tits buildings
    0 references
    cohomological dimension
    0 references
    subgroups of finite index
    0 references
    actions on trees
    0 references
    isoperimetric inequality
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references