Rotation-invariant t-norms: where triple rotation and rotation-annihilation meet (Q1038001): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Added link to MaRDI item.
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Revision as of 23:40, 30 January 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Rotation-invariant t-norms: where triple rotation and rotation-annihilation meet
scientific article

    Statements

    Rotation-invariant t-norms: where triple rotation and rotation-annihilation meet (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    17 November 2009
    0 references
    In this paper, the subject of rotation-invariant t-norms is studied. The correspondences and the differences between two approaches (of Jenei and of Maes and De Baets, respectively) are analyzed. The rotation of \(a\)-zooms of a t-norm is generalized to \((a,b)\)-zooms. Some of Jenei's results are presented in Theorems 2 and 3; since these results are inadequate to describe non-decomposable t-norms, like the Łukasiewicz t-norm, an alternative (named `triple construction'), proposed by Maes and De Baets, is briefly recalled in Section 4. In the next section, the triple rotation method (decomposition and rotation) is extended to rotation-invariant t-norms. At the end of the paper, two problems for further research are formulated.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    t-norm
    0 references
    rotation invariance
    0 references
    left continuity
    0 references