Uniform families of ergodic operator nets (Q1955754): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Created a new Item |
Added link to MaRDI item. |
||
links / mardi / name | links / mardi / name | ||
Revision as of 16:35, 1 February 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Uniform families of ergodic operator nets |
scientific article |
Statements
Uniform families of ergodic operator nets (English)
0 references
18 June 2013
0 references
Let \(\mathcal{L}(X)\) denote the algebra of bounded linear operators on a Banach space \(X\) and let \(G\ni g\mapsto S_g\in\mathcal{L}(X)\) denote a bounded continuous representation of a -- mostly amenable -- semi-topological semigroup \(G\). Generalizing, e.g., Cesaro means and Abel means (for \(G=\mathbb{Z}_+\)) and continuous analogues as, e.g., \(G=\mathbb{R}_+\ni s\mapsto (1/s)\int_0^s S(t)\,dt\) and various other means, the author investigates `strong, resp., weak ergodic nets' and `uniform families of ergodic nets': let \(S:=\{S_g:g\in G\} \subseteq \mathcal{L}(X)\), then a net \(\left(A_\alpha^S\right)_{\alpha\in \mathcal{A}}\) is strongly right ergodic if (1) \(A_\alpha^S\in\overline{co}(S)\) for all \(\alpha\in\mathcal{A}\) (\(\mathcal{A}\) denoting a fixed directed set) and (2) \(A_\alpha^S x - A_\alpha^S S_g x\to 0\) (for all \(x\in G, g\in G\)). Analogously, left ergodicity and weak ergodic nets are defined. The author's definition differs slightly from the `classical' one (cf., e.g., the monograph by \textit{U. Krengel} [Ergodic theorems. With a supplement by Antoine Brunel. Berlin-New York: Walter de Gruyter (1985; Zbl 0575.28009)]), however, relying on a result of the pioneer work of \textit{R. J. Nagel} [Ann. Inst. Fourier 23, No. 4, 75--87 (1973; Zbl 0252.47003)] it is shown in Theorem 1.4 that the existence of weak and strong ergodic nets are equivalent conditions. Uniform families of ergodic nets are families \(\left\{ A_\alpha^{S_i}: \alpha\in\mathcal{A}, i\in I\right\}\), where \(S_i, i\in I\), are bounded representations of \(G\) which are uniformly bounded and satisfy the ergodicity condition (2) and the convexity condition (1) uniformly for \(i\in I\). (The precise formulation is too complicated for a review.) A typical example is \(G=\mathbb{Z}_+\), \(\mathcal{A}=\mathbb{N}\) and \(I=\mathbb{T}:=\{\lambda\in\mathbb{C}:|\lambda|=1\}\). Let \(S\in \mathcal{L}(X)\), \(||S||\leq 1\). Then \(\left\{(1/N)\sum_0^{N-1} (\lambda S)^n : N\in\mathbb{N}, \lambda\in\mathbb{T}\right\}\) satisfies the above mentioned conditions, hence is a uniform family of ergodic nets (Wiener-Wintner theorem). If \(\left\{A_\alpha^{S_i}: \alpha\in\mathcal{A}, i\in I\right\}\) is a uniform family of ergodic nets, then, for all \(i\in I\) and \(x\in X\), \(A_\alpha^{S_i}x\) converges, however, this convergence need not to be uniform. In Theorem 2.6, the author obtains sufficient conditions for uniform convergence.
0 references
mean ergodic theorem
0 references
amenable semigroup
0 references
Wiener-Wintner theorem
0 references
ergodic net
0 references