Almost all subgeneric third-order Chow decompositions are identifiable (Q2088044): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Created a new Item |
Added link to MaRDI item. |
||
links / mardi / name | links / mardi / name | ||
Revision as of 21:17, 1 February 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Almost all subgeneric third-order Chow decompositions are identifiable |
scientific article |
Statements
Almost all subgeneric third-order Chow decompositions are identifiable (English)
0 references
21 October 2022
0 references
Let \(\mathbb{K} \in \{\mathbb{R},\mathbb{C}\}\). A Chow decomposition over \(\mathbb{K}\) expresses a homogeneous polynomial \(p \in S^{d}(\mathbb{K}^{n+1})\) of degree \(d\) in \(n+1\) variables as minimum-length sum of completely decomposable forms, i.e., \[ p(x_{0},\dots,x_{n}) = \sum_{j=1}^{r}\prod_{i=0}^{d-1}L_{i,j} = \sum_{j=1}^{r}\prod_{i=0}^{d-1}(a_{0,i,j}x_{0} + \dots + a_{n,i,j}x_{n}). \] The minimal number \(r\) is called the Chow rank of \(p\) over \(\mathbb{K}\). We have the following two natural problems about complex Chow decomposition: i) What is the minimal value of \(r\) so that almost all polynomials \(p \in S^{d}\mathbb{C}^{n+1}\) admit a Chow decomposition of rank \(r\), and ii) how many distinct complex Chow decompositions does a generic rank \(r\) polynomial \(p\) have? Consider the Zariski closure of the completely decomposable forms in \(n+1\) variables and degree \(d\), namely \[ \mathcal{C}_{d,n} = \overline{\{[L_{0} \cdots L_{d-1}] : L_{i} \text{ is linear}\}} \subset S^{d}\mathbb{P}^{n}_{\mathbb{C}}. \] It is an irreducible non-degenerate singular projective variety, and it is called either the Chow variety of zero-cycles, or the split variety. The \(d\)-forms \([p]\in S^{d}\mathbb{P}^{n}_{\mathbb{C}}\) such that \(p\) admits a rank \(r\) Chow decomposition as above form a Zariski-open subset of the \(r\)-secant variety \(\sigma_{r}(\mathcal{C}_{d,n})\subset S^{d}\mathbb{P}^{n}_{d}\). The main result of the paper under review, revolved around the second question on the above list, can be formulated as follows. Main Theorem. Let \(\mathcal{C}_{3,n} \subset S^{3}\mathbb{P}^{n}_{\mathbb{C}}\) be the degree \(3\) Chow variety of zero-cycles. Then \(\mathcal{C}_{3,n}\) is generically complex \(r\)-identifiable up to the generic rank minus \(2\), i.e., \[ r\leq r_{\mathrm{gen}}-2 = \bigg\lceil \frac{1}{3n+1}\binom{n+3}{3}\bigg\rceil -2. \] In other words, the complex Chow decomposition of a generic real or complex Chow rank \(r\) cubic \(p\) is unique in the sense that the set of completely decomposable forms \(\{\prod_{i=0}^{d-1}L_{i,1}, \dots,\prod_{i=0}^{d-1}L_{i,r}\}\) is uniquely determined by \(p\).
0 references
Chow variety
0 references
identifiability
0 references
Chow decomposition
0 references
split variety
0 references