Decomposition approaches in permutation scheduling problems with application to the M-machine flow shop scheduling problems (Q2265944): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Added link to MaRDI item.
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Revision as of 09:43, 2 February 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Decomposition approaches in permutation scheduling problems with application to the M-machine flow shop scheduling problems
scientific article

    Statements

    Decomposition approaches in permutation scheduling problems with application to the M-machine flow shop scheduling problems (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1985
    0 references
    Three different decomposition approaches are described for permutation schedules. The first, Complete decomposition, gives conditions when a scheduling problem can be decomposed into two or more scheduling problems that ca be solved separately and then recomposed. Except for some single machine scheduling problems and a few cases of other problems, it is unlikely that these conditions will be satisfied. A Partial decomposition may be employed if the Complete decomposition fails. This requires a subset enumeration procedure along with a partial satisfaction of the conditions specified before. The majority of NP-complete scheduling problems will not meet the conditions necessary to employ either of the above decompositions. In this case branch and bound can be used as a decomposition tool (Iterative decomposition). Algorithms are developed that provide upper bounds, lower bounds, branching rules as well as a heuristic estimate of the lower bound. This branch and bound decomposition approach is then implemented on the M-machine flow problem. The algorithm developed, efficiently finds optimal solutions to small flow shop problems (5 jobs/5 machines). Since the variance of CPU times required to use this algorithm is high, two heuristic algorithms are suggested. These algorithms either heuristically fathom nodes or terminate early. Their CPU times are small compared to the optimal algorithm and they provide schedules almost as good, and are therefore viewed as a practical alternative.
    0 references
    decomposition approaches
    0 references
    permutation schedules
    0 references
    Complete decomposition
    0 references
    Partial decomposition
    0 references
    branch and bound
    0 references
    Iterative decomposition
    0 references
    heuristic estimate
    0 references
    M-machine flow problem
    0 references
    flow shop
    0 references

    Identifiers