A gluing lemma and overconvergent modular forms (Q2496424): Difference between revisions

Let \(p\) be a prime. Let \(K\) be a finite extension of \(\mathbb Q_p\). In [Invent. Math. 124, No.~1--3, 215--241 (1996; Zbl 0851.11030); J. Théor. Nombr. Bordx. 9, No.~2, 395--403 (1997; Zbl 0942.11025)] \textit{R.~F. Coleman} proves the following control theorem. Theorem: Let \(f\) be an overconvergent \(U_p\)-eigenform of weight \(k\) defined over \(K\) with eigenvalue \(a_p\). If the \(p\)-adic valuation of \(a_p\) is less than \(k-1\), then \(f\) is classical. Coleman's method of proving the theorem is based on a cohomological interpretation of the space of overconvergent forms. The author presents a more intrinsic (geometric in nature) proof of (a generalization of) the control theorem. He proves a gluing lemma for sections of line bundles on a rigid analytic variety in \S2. The control theorem is then deduced from the Lemma and (a generalization of) \textit{K. Buzzard}\,'s analytic continuation results [J. Am. Math. Soc. 16, No.~1, 29--55 (2003; Zbl 0942.11025)].