Is there always an extremal Teichmüller mapping? (Q2565889): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Created a new Item |
Added link to MaRDI item. |
||
links / mardi / name | links / mardi / name | ||
Revision as of 07:47, 3 February 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Is there always an extremal Teichmüller mapping? |
scientific article |
Statements
Is there always an extremal Teichmüller mapping? (English)
0 references
28 September 2005
0 references
Given a quasisymmetric self-homeomorphism \(h\) of the unit circle \(S^1\), let \(Q(h)\) be the set of all quasiconformal mappings with the correspondence \(h\). In ''Unique extremality'', [J. Anal. Math. 75, 299--338 (1998; Zbl 0929.30017)], by \textit{V. Božin, N. Lakic, V. Marković} and \textit{M. Mateljević}, it was shown that there exists \(h\) for which no extremal extension as a Teichmüller mapping is possible. This disproved some long standing conjectures. In the example constructed there, the boundary correspondence had a single extremal quasiconformal extension. In this paper we show that even when there are infinitely many quasiconformal extensions of the boundary values, it may still happen that none of them is a Teichmüller mapping. An infinitesimal version of this result is also established.
0 references
quasisymmetric homeomorphism
0 references
quasiconformal mapping
0 references
boundary correspondence
0 references
extremal
0 references
Teichmüller mapping.
0 references