Commutative algebras and representations of the category of finite sets (Q690772): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claims
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / author
 
Property / author: Semën S. Podkorytov / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Blass Torrecillas Jover / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 20:05, 9 February 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Commutative algebras and representations of the category of finite sets
scientific article

    Statements

    Commutative algebras and representations of the category of finite sets (English)
    0 references
    29 November 2012
    0 references
    Let \(\Omega\) be the category of finite sets \(\underline n =\{1,\dots n\}\) and sujective maps. Let \(k\) be a field and \(A\) a commutative \(k\)-algebra not necessarily with unit. The author considers an analogue of the Loday functor (the functor \(L_A:\Omega \to k-Mod\) defined by: \(L_A(\underline n)=A^{\otimes n}\) and for a morphism \(f:\underline m\to \underline n\), \(L_A(h)(x_1\otimes\cdots \otimes x_m)=y_1\otimes\cdots \otimes y_n\), where \(y_j=\prod_{i\in h^{-1}(j)}x_i\)) and shows that if \(k\) is algebraically closed, \(A\) and \(B\) are finite dimensional algebras and the functors \(L_A\) and \(L_B\) are isomorphic, then the algebras \(A\) and \(B\) are isomorphic. A counterexample is given showing that if \(k\) is not algebraically closed the result does not hold.
    0 references
    Loday functor
    0 references
    commutative algebras
    0 references
    finite set category.
    0 references

    Identifiers