Precipitousness in forcing extensions (Q1077413): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claim: reviewed by (P1447): Item:Q173769
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Lev Bukovský / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 05:22, 10 February 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Precipitousness in forcing extensions
scientific article

    Statements

    Precipitousness in forcing extensions (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1984
    0 references
    W. Mitchell [see \textit{T. Jech}, \textit{M. Magidor}, \textit{W. Mitchell}, and \textit{K. Prikry}, J. Symb. Logic 45, 1-8 (1980; Zbl 0437.03026)] proved that if a measurable cardinal \(\kappa\) is collapsed to \(\omega_ 1\) by the Lévy algebra \({\mathcal L}^{\kappa}\), then \(\kappa =\omega_ 1\) is precipitous in the extension. The author introduces a large class \({\mathcal A}\) of proper forcings containing, e. g., the standard poset for making the proper forcing axiom true. The main result says that assuming \(\kappa\) supercompact, \({\mathcal L}^{\kappa}\Vdash P\in {\mathcal A}\), then \({\mathcal L}^{\kappa}*P\Vdash\) \(''\omega_ 1\) is precipitous''. As a corrollary, Con(ZFC \(+\) two supercompact cardinals) implies Con(ZFC \(+\) proper forcing axiom \(+\) \(\omega_ 1\) precipitous).
    0 references
    supercompact cardinal
    0 references
    proper forcing
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers