A comparison of two different ways to define classes of ultradifferentiable functions (Q2469060): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Removed claims |
Changed an Item |
||
Property / author | |||
Property / author: Reinhold Meise / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / reviewed by | |||
Property / reviewed by: Vincent Thilliez / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 09:12, 10 February 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | A comparison of two different ways to define classes of ultradifferentiable functions |
scientific article |
Statements
A comparison of two different ways to define classes of ultradifferentiable functions (English)
0 references
4 February 2008
0 references
In this very useful paper, the authors characterize the sequences \((M_p)_p \) such that the Beurling class of ultradifferentiable functions \( {\mathcal E}(M_p) \) defined by imposing conditions on the derivatives of the function in terms of this sequence coincides with a Beurling class of ultradifferentiable functions \( {\mathcal E}_{(\omega)} \) defined by imposing weight conditions on the Fourier-Laplace transform. As a corollary, they characterize the weights \( \omega \) for which there exists a sequence \( (M_p)_p \) such that \( {\mathcal E}(M_p) \) and \( {\mathcal E}_{(\omega)} \) coincide. These characterizations also hold in the Roumieu case. Several interesting examples are given.
0 references
ultradifferentiable functions
0 references
weight sequences
0 references
weight functions
0 references