Nonlinear feedback control of Timoshenko beam (Q1902286): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claims
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / author
 
Property / author: De-Xing Feng / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / author
 
Property / author: Wei-Tao Zhang / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 13:40, 10 February 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Nonlinear feedback control of Timoshenko beam
scientific article

    Statements

    Nonlinear feedback control of Timoshenko beam (English)
    0 references
    1 April 1996
    0 references
    Recently, much attention was given to both the static and dynamic models of Timoshenko's beam. The authors consider boundary control of the dynamic model given by coupled equations: \[ \rho {\partial^2 w\over \partial t^2}- K {\partial^2 w\over \partial x^2}+ K {\partial\varphi\over \partial x}= 0,\quad t> 0,\quad 0\leq x< \ell, \] \[ I_p {\partial^2\varphi\over \partial t^2}- EI {\partial^2\varphi\over \partial x^2}+ K\Biggl(\varphi- {\partial w\over \partial x}\Biggr)= 0,\quad t> 0,\quad 0\leq x< \ell, \] \(w(0,t)= \varphi(0, t)= 0\), \[ K\varphi(\ell, t)- K {\partial w(\ell,t)\over \partial x} = f\Biggl({\partial w(\ell, t)\over \partial t}\Biggr),\;-EI {\partial\varphi(\ell,t)\over \partial x}= g\Biggl({\partial\varphi(\ell, t)\over \partial t}\Biggr), \] \(f\) and \(g\) are monotone increasing functions. For linear boundary control the problem of energy decay and controllability was investigated by Lagnese, Lasiecka, D. Russell and their collaborators. The authors assure nonlinear controls of the form: \(f= \alpha h\), \(g= \beta h\), where \(\alpha\), \(\beta\) are constants and \[ h(\xi)= \begin{cases} |\xi|^p \text{ sign } \xi\quad &\text{when }|\xi|\leq 1\\ \xi \quad &\text{when } |\xi|> 1.\end{cases} \] Thus, the boundary feedback is still linear for large values of the signals \({\partial w\over \partial t}\), \({\partial\varphi\over \partial t}\) at \(x= \ell\). The authors define an appropriate Sobolev space \(\mathcal H\) and rewrite the effects of the closed loop control system as a nonlinear evolution equation in \(\mathcal H\). \(\dot Y(t)= AY(t)\), \(Y(0)= Y_0\), where \(Y\) is the vector \(\{w(\cdot, t), \dot w(\cdot, t), \dot\varphi(\cdot, t)\}^T\). Existence is proved via a fixed point theorem, which in turn uses Yosida's approximation to guarantee the contractive mapping property. Uniqueness is derived from equicontinuity, which they show to be a consequence of Sobolev's imbedding theorem. Next, the authors introduce a commonly used and convenient sum of squared terms representing energy: \[ E(t)= \textstyle{{1\over 2}} |Y(t)|^2= \textstyle{{1\over 2}} \int^1_0 \{\rho |\dot w|^2+ I_p|\dot \varphi|^2+ EI|\varphi'|^2\}dx. \] The proof that \(\dot E\) is negative involves a rather delicate and lengthy calculation. Some energy estimates and stability of the closed loop system follow this computation.
    0 references
    0 references
    stabilization
    0 references
    Timoshenko's beam
    0 references
    boundary control
    0 references
    nonlinear controls
    0 references
    fixed point theorem
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references