Nonlinear feedback control of Timoshenko beam (Q1902286): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Removed claims |
Changed an Item |
||
Property / author | |||
Property / author: De-Xing Feng / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / author | |||
Property / author: Wei-Tao Zhang / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 13:40, 10 February 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Nonlinear feedback control of Timoshenko beam |
scientific article |
Statements
Nonlinear feedback control of Timoshenko beam (English)
0 references
1 April 1996
0 references
Recently, much attention was given to both the static and dynamic models of Timoshenko's beam. The authors consider boundary control of the dynamic model given by coupled equations: \[ \rho {\partial^2 w\over \partial t^2}- K {\partial^2 w\over \partial x^2}+ K {\partial\varphi\over \partial x}= 0,\quad t> 0,\quad 0\leq x< \ell, \] \[ I_p {\partial^2\varphi\over \partial t^2}- EI {\partial^2\varphi\over \partial x^2}+ K\Biggl(\varphi- {\partial w\over \partial x}\Biggr)= 0,\quad t> 0,\quad 0\leq x< \ell, \] \(w(0,t)= \varphi(0, t)= 0\), \[ K\varphi(\ell, t)- K {\partial w(\ell,t)\over \partial x} = f\Biggl({\partial w(\ell, t)\over \partial t}\Biggr),\;-EI {\partial\varphi(\ell,t)\over \partial x}= g\Biggl({\partial\varphi(\ell, t)\over \partial t}\Biggr), \] \(f\) and \(g\) are monotone increasing functions. For linear boundary control the problem of energy decay and controllability was investigated by Lagnese, Lasiecka, D. Russell and their collaborators. The authors assure nonlinear controls of the form: \(f= \alpha h\), \(g= \beta h\), where \(\alpha\), \(\beta\) are constants and \[ h(\xi)= \begin{cases} |\xi|^p \text{ sign } \xi\quad &\text{when }|\xi|\leq 1\\ \xi \quad &\text{when } |\xi|> 1.\end{cases} \] Thus, the boundary feedback is still linear for large values of the signals \({\partial w\over \partial t}\), \({\partial\varphi\over \partial t}\) at \(x= \ell\). The authors define an appropriate Sobolev space \(\mathcal H\) and rewrite the effects of the closed loop control system as a nonlinear evolution equation in \(\mathcal H\). \(\dot Y(t)= AY(t)\), \(Y(0)= Y_0\), where \(Y\) is the vector \(\{w(\cdot, t), \dot w(\cdot, t), \dot\varphi(\cdot, t)\}^T\). Existence is proved via a fixed point theorem, which in turn uses Yosida's approximation to guarantee the contractive mapping property. Uniqueness is derived from equicontinuity, which they show to be a consequence of Sobolev's imbedding theorem. Next, the authors introduce a commonly used and convenient sum of squared terms representing energy: \[ E(t)= \textstyle{{1\over 2}} |Y(t)|^2= \textstyle{{1\over 2}} \int^1_0 \{\rho |\dot w|^2+ I_p|\dot \varphi|^2+ EI|\varphi'|^2\}dx. \] The proof that \(\dot E\) is negative involves a rather delicate and lengthy calculation. Some energy estimates and stability of the closed loop system follow this computation.
0 references
stabilization
0 references
Timoshenko's beam
0 references
boundary control
0 references
nonlinear controls
0 references
fixed point theorem
0 references