Minimal decompositions of graphs into mutually isomorphic subgraphs (Q1167190): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claims
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / author
 
Property / author: Fan R. K. Chung / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / author
 
Property / author: Ronald L. Graham / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Nicholas C. Wormald / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 20:24, 10 February 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Minimal decompositions of graphs into mutually isomorphic subgraphs
scientific article

    Statements

    Minimal decompositions of graphs into mutually isomorphic subgraphs (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1981
    0 references
    Let \(G=\{G_1,\dots,G_k\}\) be a collection of \(n\)-vertex graphs each with the same (unspecified) number of edges. Let \(U(G)\) be the least \(r\) for which there exists a set of partitions of the edge sets \(E(G_i)\) of the graph into \(r\) parts, say \(E(G_i)=\cup_{j=1}^{r} E_{ij}\), such that for each j, all the \(E_{ij}\) are isomorphic as graphs, \(1\leq i\leq k\). Let \(U_k(n)\) denote the largest value \(U(G)\) can take with G as above. The authors and other earlier showed [Congr. Numerantium 23, 3-18 (1979; Zbl 0434.05046)] that \(U_2(n)=2n/3+o()\) as \(n\to\infty\). Here they show \(U_k(n)=3n/4+o(n)\) for any fixed \(k\geq 3\), as \(n\to\infty\). The difficult part of the proof is the establishment of the upper bound. Broadly speaking, it is done by successively removing subgraphs which are shown to be common to all the \(G_i\), where the subgraph removed at any state depends on the number of edges in the \(G_i\).
    0 references
    0 references
    factorization
    0 references
    partition of edge set
    0 references