Note on the modified relaxation CQ algorithm for the split feasibility problem (Q1653279): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claim: author (P16): Item:Q210795
Property / author
 
Property / author: Li-Wei Liu / rank
Normal rank
 

Revision as of 03:47, 11 February 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Note on the modified relaxation CQ algorithm for the split feasibility problem
scientific article

    Statements

    Note on the modified relaxation CQ algorithm for the split feasibility problem (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    3 August 2018
    0 references
    Let two Hilbert spaces $H_{1}$ and $H_{2}$, a bounded linear operator $A:H_{1}\rightarrow H_{2}$ and two nonempty, closed and convex sets $C\subseteq H_{1}$ and $Q\subseteq H_{2}$ be given. The split feasibility problem (SFP) is to find $x^{\ast}\in C$ such that $Ax^{\ast}\in Q$. The paper under review studies a modified relaxation CQ algorithm with Armijo-line search. It is shown that the sequence generated by the algorithm weakly converges to a solution of the SFP, under the following assumptions: (a) the set of solutions is not empty, (b) the sets $C$ and $Q$ are defined as $C=\left \{ x\in H_{1}|c(x)\leq0\right \}$, $Q=\left \{ x\in H_{2}|q(x)\leq0\right \} $ where the functions $c:H_{1}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ and $q:H_{2} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ are convex, and (c) at each $x\in H_{1}$, $y\in H_{2}$, at least one subgradient $\xi \in \partial c(x)$ and $\eta \in \partial q(x)$ can be calculated. \par The result extends an analogous result by \textit{B. Qu} and \textit{N. Xiu} [Inverse Probl. 21, No. 5, 1655--1665 (2005; Zbl 1080.65033)] to infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces. \par In a numerical example, the algorithm above is compared to the relaxed CQ algorithm, proposed by Q. Yang.
    0 references
    0 references
    split feasibility problem
    0 references
    Armijo-line search
    0 references