Neutrally stable outcomes in cheap-talk coordination games (Q1581903): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claims
Property / author
 
Property / author: Abhijit V. Banerjee / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / author
 
Property / author: Joergen W. Weibull / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Gerald A. Heuer / rank
Normal rank
 

Revision as of 07:09, 11 February 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Neutrally stable outcomes in cheap-talk coordination games
scientific article

    Statements

    Neutrally stable outcomes in cheap-talk coordination games (English)
    0 references
    10 June 2001
    0 references
    Recall that a strategy is evolutionarily stable if it is a best reply to itself and a better reply to all other best replies than these are to themselves. It is neutrally stable if it is a best reply to itself and a weakly better reply to all other best replies than these are to themselves. This paper examines the weaker of these two concepts, neutral stability, and compares its cutting power with that of stringent noncooperative refinements. An outcome is called neutrally stable if it is the payoff that results when a neutrally stable strategy meets itself. The authors characterize the set of neutrally stable outcomes in cheap-talk \(2\times 2\) coordination games. If the message set is finite, so is this set of outcomes. As the number of messages goes to infinity, the set of outcomes expands toward a countable limit with the Pareto efficient Nash equilibrium as its unique cluster point.
    0 references
    0 references
    coordination games
    0 references
    cheap-talk games
    0 references
    evolutionary stability
    0 references
    neutral stability
    0 references