Large subspaces of compositionally universal functions with maximal cluster sets (Q765686): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claims
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / author
 
Property / author: Luis Bernal-González / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / author
 
Property / author: María del Carmen Calderón-Moreno / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 09:26, 11 February 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Large subspaces of compositionally universal functions with maximal cluster sets
scientific article

    Statements

    Large subspaces of compositionally universal functions with maximal cluster sets (English)
    0 references
    22 March 2012
    0 references
    Let \(G\subset\mathbb{C}\) be a domain such that \(\partial G\) is a homeomorphic image of \(\partial\mathbb{D}\), where \(\mathbb{D}=\big\{z\in\mathbb{C}:| z| <1\big\}\). If \(f:G\rightarrow \mathbb{C}\) is a function and \(A\) is a subset of \(G,\) then the cluster set of \(f\) along \(A\) is defined as the set \(C_A(f)\) of points \(w\in\mathbb{C}_{\infty}:=\mathbb{C}\cup\{\infty\}\) such that there exists a sequence \((z_n)\) in \(A\) tending to some point of \(\partial G\) satisfying \(f(z_n)\rightarrow w\). We denote by \( \Gamma (G)\) the family of all curves \(\gamma\) in \(G\) tending to the boundary of \(G\) and satisfying \((\partial G)\setminus \overline{\gamma}\neq\emptyset\). The paper deals with the combination of the phenomena of dense-lineability or spaceability with the maximality of cluster sets of holomorphic functions. To be more precise, we say that a subset of an infinite dimensional topological vector space \(X\) is dense-lineable (resp. spaceable) if it contains a dense (resp. closed infinite-dimensional) linear subspace of \(X\) apart from zero. So the main result states as follows: Let \((\varphi_n)\) be a sequence of holomorphics self-maps of \(G\) such that, for every compact subset \(K\) of \(G,\) there is some \(N\in\mathbb{N}\) such that \(\varphi_N(K)\cap K=\emptyset\) and the restriction \(\varphi_{N| K}\) is injective. Then the set \(MCS\big(\Gamma(G)\big)\cap HC(C_{\varphi_n})\) is dense lineable and spaceable in \(H(G)\), where - \(H(G)\) is the vector space of holomorphic functions endowed with the topology of uniform convergence on compact sets; - \(MCS\big(\Gamma(G)\big)\) stands for the set of functions \(f\in H(G)\) satisfying \(C_A(f)=\mathbb{C}_{\infty}\) for all \(A\in \Gamma (G)\); - \(HC(C_{\varphi_n})\) stands for the set of functions \(f\in H(G)\) whose orbit \(\big\{C_{\varphi_n}(f):=f\circ\varphi_n:n\in\mathbb{N}\big\}\) (i.e. the orbit under the sequence of composition operator \(C_{\varphi_n}:H(G)\rightarrow H(G)\), \(f\mapsto f\circ\varphi_n\)) is dense in \(H(G)\). At the end of the paper there is an interesting open question: Let \((T_n)\) be a hereditarily densely hypercyclic sequence of operators on \(H(G)\), and let \(HC(T_n)\) be the set of its universal elements. Is the set \(MCS\big(\Gamma(G)\big)\cap HC(T_n)\) dense-lineable or spaceable?
    0 references
    compositional universality
    0 references
    cluster sets
    0 references
    composition operators
    0 references
    hypercyclic vectors
    0 references
    dense-lineability
    0 references
    spaceability
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references