Boundary regularity for the steady generalized Newtonian flow with shear thickening viscosity (Q831429): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claims
Property / author
 
Property / author: Joerg Wolf / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Alain Brillard / rank
Normal rank
 

Revision as of 23:24, 11 February 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Boundary regularity for the steady generalized Newtonian flow with shear thickening viscosity
scientific article

    Statements

    Boundary regularity for the steady generalized Newtonian flow with shear thickening viscosity (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    23 March 2022
    0 references
    The authors consider the Navier-Stokes problem \(-\nabla \cdot \sigma +u\cdot \nabla u=-\nabla p+f\), \(\operatorname{div} u=0\), posed in the half-space \(\Omega = \mathbb{R}_{+}^{3}\), where the deviatoric stress is defined by \(\sigma _{ij}=\left\vert D(u)\right\vert ^{q-2}D_{ij}(u)\), with \(D(u)=\frac{1}{2} (\nabla u+(\nabla u)^{T})\) and \(2<q<3\). Homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions \(u=0\) is imposed on \(\partial \Omega \). The authors prove boundary regularity for weak solutions to this problem. For \(f\in L^{3q/(4q-3)}(\Omega )\), they first define the notion of weak solution as a function \(u\in \widehat{W}_{0,\sigma }^{1,q}(\Omega )\) which satisfies a variational formulation, the notion of suitable weak solution if \(u\) further satisfies \( \int_{\Omega }\left\vert D(u)\right\vert ^{q}dx\leq \int_{\Omega }f\cdot udx\), and the notion of strong solution as a couple \((u,p)\in \widehat{W}_{0,\sigma }^{1,q}(\Omega )\times L_{loc}^{q^{\prime }}(\Omega )\) which further satisfies \(\sigma _{ij}\in W^{1,s}(\Omega )\) and \(D_{i}p\in L^{s}(\Omega )\) for some \(s\geq 1\). The main result proves that if \(f\in L^{3q/(4q-3)}(\Omega )\cap W^{1,q^{\prime }}(\Omega )\), every weak solution to the Navier-Stokes problem is strong, \(\nabla u\in L^{s}(\Omega )\), for every \(1\leq s<\frac{5q}{2}\), and \(D_{3}\sigma _{ij},D_{3}p\in L^{s}(\Omega ) \) for every \(1\leq s<\frac{2q^{\prime }}{3}\). This implies that \(u\) is Hölder continuous up to the boundary, that is \(u\in C^{\gamma }(\overline{ \Omega })\), for every \(0\leq \gamma <1-\frac{6}{5q}\). For the proof, the authors follow that they used in their previous paper [J. Differ. Equations 258, No. 11, 3811--3850 (2015; Zbl 1315.35046)], but they introduce a localized approximate system \(-\nabla \cdot \sigma ^{\varepsilon ,N}+\nabla p_{\varepsilon ,N}=-U_{N}\cdot \nabla (U_{N}+w_{\varepsilon ,N})+f\), \( \operatorname{div} w_{\varepsilon ,N}=0\), posed in \(U_{2r}^{+}=B_{2r}^{\prime }(x_{0})\times (0,2r)\), for \(x_{0}\in \{x\in \mathbb{R}^{3}:x_{3}=0\}\) and \( 0<r<\infty \). They also use a linearization of the non-linear term \(u\cdot \nabla u\). The homogeneous Dirichlet boundary condition \(w_{\varepsilon ,N}=0\) is imposed on \(\partial U_{2r}^{+}\). Here \(\sigma ^{\varepsilon ,N}=2\varepsilon D(u_{\varepsilon ,N})+\left\vert D(u_{\varepsilon ,N})\right\vert ^{q}-2D(u_{\varepsilon ,N})\), \(u_{\varepsilon ,N}=U_{N}+w_{\varepsilon ,N}\), and \(U_{N}\) is a mollification of \(u\). The authors prove estimates of the second gradient of \(u_{\varepsilon }\) in the tangential and normal directions and higher \(L^{p}\)-estimates of \(\nabla u\) using weighted Sobolev embeddings. They finally pass to the limits when \( \varepsilon \rightarrow 0\) and \(N\rightarrow \infty \).
    0 references
    weak solution
    0 references
    stationary Navier-Stokes equations
    0 references
    shear-dependent viscosity
    0 references
    Hölder regularity
    0 references
    tangential derivative estimate
    0 references
    normal derivative estimate
    0 references
    weighted embedding method
    0 references

    Identifiers