Not every metrizable compactum is the limit of an inverse sequence with simplicial bonding maps (Q1709057): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claim: reviewed by (P1447): Item:Q260559
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Žiga Virk / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 09:46, 12 February 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Not every metrizable compactum is the limit of an inverse sequence with simplicial bonding maps
scientific article

    Statements

    Not every metrizable compactum is the limit of an inverse sequence with simplicial bonding maps (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    27 March 2018
    0 references
    It is well known that each compact metrizable space can be written as the inverse limit of an inverse sequence of finite polyhedra with piecewise linear bonding maps. This means that for each bonding map of the inverse system, its domain and range can be triangulated so that the bonding map is simplicial. In this short note it is shown that one can't choose fixed triangulations on terms of the inverse system, which would make all bonding maps simplicial. To put it differently, not every metrizable compactum can be written as the inverse limit of an inverse sequence of finite triangulated polyhedra with simplicial bonding maps. The paper was posthumously prepared and edited by Leonard R. Rubin, to whom the argument was communicated by Sibe Mardešić.
    0 references
    absolute extensor
    0 references
    cohomological dimension
    0 references
    CW-complex
    0 references
    extension theory
    0 references
    inverse limit
    0 references
    inverse sequence
    0 references
    polyhedron
    0 references
    simplicial map
    0 references
    triangulation
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers