On the construction of contact submanifolds with prescribed topology. (Q1609802): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q115202953, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1706974296281
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claims
Property / author
 
Property / author: Alberto Ibort / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / author
 
Property / author: David Martínez Torres / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / author
 
Property / author: Francisco Presas / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Akihiko Morimoto / rank
Normal rank
 

Revision as of 11:25, 12 February 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On the construction of contact submanifolds with prescribed topology.
scientific article

    Statements

    On the construction of contact submanifolds with prescribed topology. (English)
    0 references
    15 August 2002
    0 references
    Let \(C\) be a compact contact manifold of dimension \(2n+1\) with a completely nonintegrable hyperplane distribution \(D\) on \(C\). Locally, \(D\) is defined by the kernel of a 1-form \(\theta\), that is \(D_x= \text{Ker}(\theta(x))\), and the locally defined 2-form \(d\theta\) is nondegenerate when restricted to \(D\). A contact submanifold of the contact manifold \((C,D_C)\) is a triple \((N,D_N, i)\), where \((N,D_N)\) is a contact manifold and \(i: N\to C\) is an embedding such that \(D_N= i^{-1}_*(D_C)\). The authors prove the following theorem: Let \(E\to C\) be a rank \(r\) complex vector bundle over \(C\) \((r\leq n)\) with top Chern class \(c_r(E)\). Then, there exists a contact submanifold \(W\) of \(C\) realizing the Poincaré dual of \(C_r(E)\) on \(H_{2n+1-2r}(C,\mathbb{Z})\). This result is analogue in the contact category to \textit{S. K. Donaldson's} construction of symplectic submanifolds [J. Differ. Geom. 44, 666--705 (1996; Zbl 0883.53032)]. The main tool in the proof is to show the existence of sequences of sections which are asymptotically holomorphic in an appropriate sense, and follows in some part the proof of \textit{D. Auroux} [Geom. Funct. Anal. 7, 971--995 (1997; Zbl 0912.53020)].
    0 references
    0 references
    contact submanifolds of contact manifolds
    0 references
    0 references