Necessity of non-stratified and anti-stratified spaces in lattice-valued topology (Q969581): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Removed claims |
Changed an Item |
||
Property / author | |||
Property / author: Stephen E. Rodabaugh / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / reviewed by | |||
Property / reviewed by: Javier Gutiérrez García / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 14:02, 12 February 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Necessity of non-stratified and anti-stratified spaces in lattice-valued topology |
scientific article |
Statements
Necessity of non-stratified and anti-stratified spaces in lattice-valued topology (English)
0 references
7 May 2010
0 references
The necessity of stratified spaces in lattice-valued topology is well known. On the other hand, the necessity of non-stratified spaces was recognized a long time ago. The paper provides some further arguments for the necessity of both stratified and non-stratified spaces in fixed-basis topology and variable-basis topology. This is done by studying the characteristic functor, the \(L\)-spectrum and \(L\)-soberification functors, the upper free functor associated with chain-valued frames, and two functorial embeddings associated with topological systems from semantic domains.
0 references
\(L\)-top
0 references
fixed-basis topology
0 references
loc-top
0 references
variable-basis topology
0 references
\(L\)-frame
0 references
\(L\)-locale
0 references
\(L\)-frm
0 references
\(L\)-loc
0 references
non-stratified \(L\)-topological space
0 references
anti-stratified \(L\)-topological space
0 references
normalized \(L\)-topological space
0 references
conormalized \(L\)-topological space
0 references
binormalized \(L\)-topological space
0 references
hypernormalized \(L\)-topological space
0 references
\(L\)-sobriety
0 references
\(L\)-spectrum
0 references
satisfaction relation
0 references
topological system
0 references
topsys
0 references