Invariance of projective modules in \(\mathsf{Sup}\) under self-duality (Q2226980): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claims
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / author
 
Property / author: Tomasz Kubiak / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Sergey A. Solovyov / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 14:05, 12 February 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Invariance of projective modules in \(\mathsf{Sup}\) under self-duality
scientific article

    Statements

    Invariance of projective modules in \(\mathsf{Sup}\) under self-duality (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    9 February 2021
    0 references
    Given a unital quantale \((Q,\otimes, e)\), there exists the category \(\mathbf{Mod}{}_{r}(Q)\) of \textit{right unital \(Q\)-modules}, whose objects are pairs \((M,\boxdot)\), where \(M\) is a complete lattice, and \(\boxdot:M\times Q\rightarrow M\) is a map with the following four properties: (1) \((\bigvee S)\boxdot q=\bigvee_{s\in S}(s\boxdot q)\) for every \(S\subseteq M\) and every \(q\in Q\); (2) \(m\boxdot(\bigvee T)=\bigvee_{t\in T}(m\boxdot t)\) for every \(m\in M\) and every \(T\subseteq Q\); (3) \((m\boxdot q_1)\boxdot q_2=m\boxdot(q_1\otimes q_2)\) for every \(m\in M\) and every \(q_1,q_2\in Q\); and (4) \(m\boxdot e=m\) for every \(m\in M\) (see, [\textit{D. Kruml} and \textit{J. Paseka}, Handb. Algebra 5, 323--362 (2008; Zbl 1219.06016)] for more detail). In particular, if \(Q\) is the two-element quantale \(\mathsf{2}=\{\bot,\top\}\), then the category \(\mathbf{Mod}{}_{r}(\mathsf{2})\) is isomorphic to the category \textbf{Sup} of complete latices and join-preserving maps. If \(Q\) has additionally an involution \({}^{\prime}\), then there exists a \textit{self-duality} on the category \(\mathbf{Mod}{}_{r}(Q)\), i.e., a contravariant functor \(S:\mathbf{Mod}{}_{r}(Q)\rightarrow\mathbf{Mod}{}_{r}(Q)\) such that \(S\circ S=1_{\mathbf{Mod}{}_{r}(Q)}\), defined on an object \((M,\boxdot)\) by \(S(M,\boxdot)=(M^{op},\boxdot^{op})\), where \(M^{op}\) is the dual complete lattice of \(M\), and \(m\boxdot^{op}q=\bigvee\{n\in M\,|\, n\boxdot q^{\prime}\leqslant m\,\}\); and on a morphism \(f:(M,\boxdot)\rightarrow(N,\boxdot)\) by \(S(f)=f^{\vdash}\), where \(f^{\vdash:}N^{op}\rightarrow M^{op}\) is the right adjoint map of \(f\) (in the sense of partially ordered sets). Based in their previous study of quantales and quantale modules in [\textit{P. Eklund} et al., Semigroups in complete lattices. Quantales, modules and related topics. Cham: Springer (2018; Zbl 1491.06001)] and the paper of \textit{I. Stubbe} [Theor. Comput. Sci. 373, No. 1--2, 142--160 (2007; Zbl 1111.68073)], who showed that projectivity in the category \(\mathbf{Mod}{}_{r}(Q)\) is equivalent to complete distributivity enriched over \(Q\), the present authors consider preservation of projectivity by the above-mentioned duality \(S\). More precisely, they show that if the underlying quantale \(Q\) is unital and involutive with a designated element (see Definition 4.5 for more detail), then the duality \(S\) preserves projectivity if and only if \(Q\) has a dualizing element (Theorem~4.11). The last section of the paper shows that involutive quantales from the above result are widespread, e.g., they are induced by completely distributive lattices with an order-reversing involution or by arbitrary groups. The paper is well written, provides most of its required preliminaries, and will be of interest to all the researchers studying categories enriched in quantales.
    0 references
    complete distributivity
    0 references
    complete lattice
    0 references
    cyclic element
    0 references
    dualizing element
    0 references
    enriched category
    0 references
    monoidal category
    0 references
    preordered set
    0 references
    presheaf
    0 references
    projective module
    0 references
    quantale
    0 references
    quantale module
    0 references
    totally below relation
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references