Safe beliefs for propositional theories (Q1779312): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claims
Property / author
 
Property / author: José Ramón Enrique Arrazola Ramírez / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: N. K. Zamov / rank
Normal rank
 

Revision as of 17:32, 12 February 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Safe beliefs for propositional theories
scientific article

    Statements

    Safe beliefs for propositional theories (English)
    0 references
    1 June 2005
    0 references
    The paper presents an extension of answer sets that are called safe beliefs. Safe beliefs allow for the use of arbitrary propositional theories as logic programs. The presented approach allows for the use of even modal or temporal logics as the underlying inference system to produce different semantic operators with additional or extended features. One of the main theorems of the paper shows that any propositional logic that is strictly weaker than classical logic and stronger than intuitionistic logic can be used in the definition of safe beliefs without modifying the resulting semantic operator. Another contribution of the paper is to present a translation that can be used to reduce any propositional theory into the class of augmented logic programs. Other translations can be used to provide a polynomial reduction of arbitrary propositional theories into disjunctive logic programs. Reviewer's remark: The 7th line of p. 66 contains a misprint: the atoms \(b_{m+1},\dots, b_{m+l}\) must be negated.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    logic programming
    0 references
    answer set semantics
    0 references
    safe beliefs
    0 references