Analysis and design of descriptor linear systems (Q986027): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claim: reviewed by (P1447): Item:Q335939
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Nicholas P. Karampetakis / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 14:54, 13 February 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Analysis and design of descriptor linear systems
scientific article

    Statements

    Analysis and design of descriptor linear systems (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    10 August 2010
    0 references
    Descriptor systems are otherwise called singular systems, generalized state space systems, semi-state systems, differential algebraic systems, degenerate systems, constrained systems, etc. Descriptor systems have been intensively studied since 1970 and appear in many fields such as power systems, electrical networks etc. Although many articles on descriptor systems have been written until now, there are very few books written on this topic. Among these books, we distinguish the books of \textit{L. Dai} [Singular control systems. Berlin etc.: Springer-Verlag (1989; Zbl 0669.93034)], \textit{S. L. Campbell} [Singular systems of differential equations. II. San Francisco-London-Melbourne: Pitman Advanced Publishing Program (1982; Zbl 0482.34008)], \textit{P. Kunkel} and \textit{V. Mehrmann} [Differential-algebraic equations. Analysis and numerical solution. Zürich: European Mathematical Society Publishing House (2006; Zbl 1095.34004)]. The book of Duan has as a main reference the book of Dai, but also refers to many papers written for descriptor systems and a lot of the author's own results on this topic. Chapter 1 starts with describing different representations of descriptor state systems. Some examples of descriptor systems are presented from different fields, i.e., electrical circuit systems, large scale systems, constrained mechanical systems and robotic systems. At the end of this chapter an outline of the basic problems for descriptor linear system analysis and design is given. The book is separated into two parts: the first concerns the analysis of descriptor systems, whereas the second one is devoted to the design of descriptor systems. Part I. Descriptor Linear Systems Analysis. Since the state space representation of a descriptor system is not unique, a number of equivalence relations between descriptor systems have been defined in the past. Chapter 2 introduces the Restricted System Equivalence (RSE) transformation, as well as some properties that remain invariant under this transformation. Based on the RSE transformation, a number of canonical forms are defined for descriptor systems. One of these canonical forms is the Kronecker canonical form that gives rise to information concerning the existence, uniqueness and structure of solutions of descriptor systems. However, such important topics as complete equivalence [\textit{A. C. Pugh, G. E. Hayton} and \textit{P. Fretwell}, Int. J. Control 45, 529--548 (1987; Zbl 0623.93013)], strong equivalence [\textit{B. D. O. Anderson, W. A. Coppel} and \textit{D. J. Cullen}, J. Aust. Math. Soc., Ser. B 27, 194--222 (1985; Zbl 0594.93015), \textit{W. A. Coppel} and \textit{D. J. Cullen}, J. Aust. Math. Soc., Ser. B 27, 223--237 (1985; Zbl 0594.93016)] and fundamental equivalence [\textit{G. E. Hayton, P. Fretwell} and \textit{A. C. Pugh}, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 31, 431--439 (1986; Zbl 0616.93002)] are not considered. The important work of \textit{M. Kuijper} [First-order representations of linear systems. Boston, MA: Birkhäuser (1994; Zbl 0863.93001)] on descriptor systems is also missing. Chapter 3 starts with the definition and some criteria for the regularity of descriptor systems which guarantee the existence and uniqueness of solutions. Then, based on the restricted system equivalence it provides two canonical forms for regular descriptor systems, i.e., the standard decomposition form or otherwise the Weierstrass form and the inverse form. The distributional and the classical solution is defined in the sequel. The first one, which exists under any possible initial conditions, is given in terms of generalized functions whereas the second one exists when the initial values are consistent (satisfy the system equations and giving rise to non-impulsive solutions). A reference that is missing from this distinction on the solutions is \textit{A. I. G. Vardulakis, E. N. Antoniou} and \textit{N. Karampetakis} [Int. J. Control 72, No. 3, 215--228 (1999; Zbl 1001.93039)]. The definition of the finite and infinite generalized eigenvectors and its relation to the eigenstructure decomposition is discussed in the sequel. Stability with or without impulse-freeness is discussed at the end of this section. Besides the direct criterion for stability, two criteria using generalized Lyapunov equations have also been provided. Chapter 4 introduces various types of definitions for controllability and observability. Then, it gives criteria for controllability and observability based on: a) the standard decomposition form, b) directly onto the original systems data, c) the equivalent canonical decomposition form, d) the equivalent inverse form, and e) the equivalent form for derivative feedback. Finally, two problems that are closely related with the concept of controllability and observability are considered: a) system structural decomposition of regular descriptor systems and b) minimal realization of non-proper transfer functions. In my opinion, the evolution of the state in a descriptor system of the form \(E\dot{x}(t)=Ax(t)+Bu(t)\), \(E,A\in \mathbb R^{n\times n}\), \(B\in\mathbb R^{n\times m}\) is actually depending on the initial conditions \(Ex(0-)\) and therefore the notion of observability must be connected with the construction of \(Ex(0-)\) by the knowledge of input and output data in a time interval, something that has not been considered in this chapter. There is also no distinction between the initial values before/after the systems starts i.e. \(x(0-)\) and \(x(0+)\) respectively, that has relations with the existence of the impulsive terms in the solution of the system [Vardulakis et al., loc. cit.]. Part II. Descriptor Linear Systems Design. Chapter 5 considers the regularization problem for descriptor systems, defined as follows: ``Given a typical descriptor linear system find a feedback controller of certain type (proportional feedback, derivative feedback or combination of them is studied in this work) for the systems such that the closed loop system is regular.'' Necessary and sufficient conditions are established for the proposed regularization problem that depend only on the open-loop system coefficient matrices, and are easily implemented. Chapter 6 investigates the problem of dynamical order assignment in descriptor systems via full and partial state derivative feedback. It proposes also the solution of the aforementioned problem by proposing all the minimum Frobenius norm solutions. The normalization of descriptor systems, which is a special case of the dynamical order assignment problem (the dynamical order to be assigned equal to the system dimension), is solved by using derivative feedback at the end of the chapter. Chapter 7 solves the impulse elimination problem. More specifically, it finds a certain type of feedback controller (state-feedback, output-feedback, partial-derivative feedback) for the system such that the closed-loop system is impulse free. Necessary and sufficient conditions are proposed for each case of feedback control and specific solutions have been proposed. Chapter 8 studies the problems of pole assignment and stabilization for descriptor systems. More specifically, three types of pole assignment have been studied: a) existence of a state-feedback controller that assigns the set of open-loop finite poles to \(\deg \det (sE-A)\) arbitrary prescribed self-conjugate complex numbers, b) existence of a state-feedback controller that assigns the set of open-loop finite poles to rank \(E\) prescribed finite eigenvalues (thus impulsive elimination is also included), c) existence of a state partial-derivative feedback controller that assigns the set of open-loop finite poles to \(n\) (dimension of \(E\)) prescribed finite eigenvalues (thus normalization is also included). The problem of eigenstructure assignment in descriptor systems via state feedback is considered in Chapter 9, based on the work of the author [Int. J. Control 69, No. 5, 663--694 (1998; Zbl 0949.93029)]. Chapter 10 studies the optimal control problem for descriptor systems with emphases on the infinite time state quadratic regulation problem and the time-optimal control problem. The technique used is first to convert the problem into a corresponding one for normal linear system and then solve it by using well-known techniques for normal linear systems. Finally, the last chapter studies the problem of observer design for descriptor systems by considering design of several types of observers. Part III is an appendix that contains mathematical results related to certain chapters of the book.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    descriptor systems
    0 references
    singular systems
    0 references
    generalized state space systems
    0 references
    semi-state systems
    0 references
    differential algebraic systems
    0 references
    degenerate systems
    0 references
    constrained systems
    0 references
    restricted system equivalence
    0 references
    regularity
    0 references
    stability
    0 references
    controllability
    0 references
    observability
    0 references
    system structural decomposition
    0 references
    minimal realization
    0 references
    regularization
    0 references
    dynamical order assignment
    0 references
    impulse elimination
    0 references
    pole assignment
    0 references
    stabilization
    0 references
    stabilizability
    0 references
    detectability
    0 references
    eigenstructure assignment
    0 references
    optimal control
    0 references
    observer design
    0 references