On the worst case of three algorithms for computing the Jacobi symbol (Q752075): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claim: author (P16): Item:Q405317
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / author
 
Property / author: Jeffrey O. Shallit / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 08:46, 14 February 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On the worst case of three algorithms for computing the Jacobi symbol
scientific article

    Statements

    On the worst case of three algorithms for computing the Jacobi symbol (English)
    0 references
    1990
    0 references
    The author considers the worst case computation of the Jacobi symbol \((\frac{u}{v})\) by analogues of the Euclidean algorithm. One can insist on even quotients (Eisenstein), least remainders (Lebesgue), or the ordinary algorithm, (reducing even factors as they occur). For the first type the worst case is \(u=2n+1\), \(v=2n-1\), for the second and third types of the worst cases generate fascinating quadratic and sextic recurrences. The logarithmic character of the algorithm is easily upheld.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    computation of the Jacobi symbol
    0 references
    algorithm
    0 references
    0 references