Bi-Sobolev mappings and elliptic equations in the plane (Q1018332): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claims
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / author
 
Property / author: Antonia Passarelli Di Napoli / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: David A. Brannan / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 10:17, 15 February 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Bi-Sobolev mappings and elliptic equations in the plane
scientific article

    Statements

    Bi-Sobolev mappings and elliptic equations in the plane (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    19 May 2009
    0 references
    The authors obtain an important generalisation of quasiconformal mappings and their relation to PDEs. Let \(\Omega\), \(\Omega'\) be bounded domains in \(\mathbb{R}^2\). The function \(f=(u,v)\), \(f:\Omega @>\text{onto}>>\Omega'\), is a bi-Sobolev mapping if it is a homeomorphism belonging to the Sobolev space \(W^{1,1}_{\text{loc}} (\Omega;\Omega')\) and its inverse \(f^{-1}\) belongs to \(W^{1,1}_{\text{loc}}(\Omega';\Omega)\). The authors prove that \(u\) and \(v\) have the same critical points; as an application, they show that \(u\) and \(v\) are distributional solutions of the same nontrivial degenerate elliptic equation in divergence form. Whereas to each quasiconformal mapping there corresponds an elliptic PDF, they determine the different situation when \(f=(u,v)\) is only a \(W^{1,1}_{\text{loc}}\)-homeomorphism and the distortion of the mapping is not bounded. They then examine distortion properties of \(W^{1,p}\)-bi-Sobolev mappings in \(\mathbb{R}^n\) and construct a number of useful counterexamples.
    0 references
    0 references
    Sobolev spaces
    0 references
    quasiconformal mapping
    0 references
    distortion
    0 references
    Sobolev mapping
    0 references
    mapping of finite distortion
    0 references