Sweeping by a continuous prox-regular set (Q1864647): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claims
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / author
 
Property / author: Manuel D. P. Monteiro Marques / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Daniel C. Biles / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 19:29, 15 February 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Sweeping by a continuous prox-regular set
scientific article

    Statements

    Sweeping by a continuous prox-regular set (English)
    0 references
    18 March 2003
    0 references
    The authors consider the ``sweeping process' in a Hilbert space \(H\), specifically, the problem \[ -u'(t)\in N_{C(t)}(u(t)),\quad u(0)= u_0\in C(0),\quad u(t)\in C(t),\quad t\in [0,T], \] where \(C: [0,T]\to 2^H\) and \(N_K(x)\) represents the Clarke normal cone to \(K\) at \(x\). The goal of the paper is to extend results in the literature in which \(C\) is convex-valued (see [\textit{M. D. P. Monteiro Marques}, Differential inclusions in nonsmooth mechanical problems. Shocks and dry friction. Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and their Applications. 9. Basel: Birkhäuser (1993; Zbl 0802.73003)]) to the noncovnex case. Instead, \(C\) is required to be prox-regular-valued. (A closed set \(K\subseteq H\) is prox-regular if there exists a continuous function \(\varphi: K\to [0,\infty)\) such that for all \(x,y\in K\) and \(v\in N_K(x)\) we have \(v\cdot (y- x)\leq\varphi(x)|v||y-x|^2\). Note that a prox-regular set is convex if and only if \(\varphi\equiv 0\). Also, prox-regular sets are known under different names in the literature.) According to the authors, prox-regularity is a sort of ``a local version of convexity'' and ``the lack of monotonicity of the normal cone is controlled by \(\varphi\)''. Theorems are proven which guarantee local and global existence and uniqueness of continuous solutions with bounded variation, and a continuous dependence result is also proven. A number of examples is given, including examples that (a) give an application to Brownian motion, (b) illustrate that solutions need not be absolutely continuous, (c) demonstrate that infinitely many solutions might exist if assumptions are not satisfied, and (d) illustrate that solutions need not have bounded variation if assumptions are not satisfied.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    sweeping process
    0 references
    evolution problem
    0 references
    regular nonconvex sets
    0 references
    metric projection
    0 references
    proximal normal cone
    0 references
    functions with bounded variation
    0 references