Homeomorphism versus isomorphism for varieties (Q1262911): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claim: reviewed by (P1447): Item:Q587330
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Tadeusz Krasiński / rank
Normal rank
 

Revision as of 18:44, 19 February 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Homeomorphism versus isomorphism for varieties
scientific article

    Statements

    Homeomorphism versus isomorphism for varieties (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1989
    0 references
    Let f: \(Y\to X\) be a morphism of algebraic varieties over a fixed algebraically closed field, which is birational and a homeomorphism of the underlying topological spaces. If X is weakly normal [\textit{A. Andreotti} and \textit{E. Bombieri}, Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa, Sci. Fis. Mat., III. Ser. 23, 431-450 (1969; Zbl 0184.245)]), it was assumed by several authors (the papers are indicated) that then f is an isomorphism of varieties. In the paper, the author gives a counterexample to this assumption and proves that it is true under the assumption that X has no one-dimensional components. - As a corollary he obtains a characterization of the weak normalization of a variety X without one-dimensional components.
    0 references
    birational morphism
    0 references
    weak normalization
    0 references
    one-dimensional components
    0 references

    Identifiers