Reconsidering a scientific revolution: the case of Einstein versus Lorentz (Q1811292): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claim: reviewed by (P1447): Item:Q593735
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Cristina Irimia / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 01:03, 20 February 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Reconsidering a scientific revolution: the case of Einstein versus Lorentz
scientific article

    Statements

    Reconsidering a scientific revolution: the case of Einstein versus Lorentz (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    28 October 2003
    0 references
    The author of the study under review, Michael Janssen (Univ. of Minnesota), parallels the scientific debate between Albert Einstein and Hendrik A. Lorentz with that between Copernicus and Ptolemy. Knowledge of Lorentz' ether theory may be understood and explained better if considering his ideas and interpretations on invariance. It is known that Lorentz's theory represents a combination between Newtonian mechanics and Maxwellian electrodynamics. From Newton, Lorentz took over the space-time arena and the laws of motion. On the other hand, Einstein's special theory of relativity (first discussed in his ``On the electrodynamics of moving bodies'') seems to have similar concerns with the scientific interests of Lorentz. The opposition between them may be expressed as: \textit{constructive theory} and \textit{theory of principle}.
    0 references
    0 references
    relativity
    0 references
    ether theory
    0 references
    invariance
    0 references
    Einstein
    0 references
    Lorentz
    0 references
    empirical equivalence
    0 references