Difficult relationships between functional analysis and mathematical physics (Q921447): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item. |
Removed claim: reviewed by (P1447): Item:Q705104 |
||
Property / reviewed by | |||
Property / reviewed by: Silvio Nocilla / rank | |||
Revision as of 11:11, 20 February 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Difficult relationships between functional analysis and mathematical physics |
scientific article |
Statements
Difficult relationships between functional analysis and mathematical physics (English)
0 references
1990
0 references
In order to point out the basic role played by the choice of the norm for stating properties in problems of analysis and mathematical physics, the author develops and discusses three examples. Firstly the Volterra integral equation: \(U(x,t)=\exp (-x^ 2)+\int^{t}_{1}(2/\tau -6\tau^ 5x^ 2)U(x,\tau)d\tau,\) having as solution the function: \(u(t)\equiv U(x,t)=t^ 2\exp (-t^ 6x^ 2)\) defined for \(t\in [1,+\infty)\) with values in a Banach space S. The author comes to the conclusion that assuming as space S the space with the norm \(\| \nu \| =\int^{1}_{-1}| \nu (x)| dx\) the above solution u(t) is asymptotically stable. At the contrary the statement is not true if the space S has the norm \(\| \nu \| =\max_{[-1,1]}| \nu (x)|.\) A second example refers to the ``well-posedness'' of the Cauchy problem for the Laplace operator. The last example refers to the ``principle of fading memory'' in visco- elasticity, with consideration of the integral equation in \(\epsilon\) (t): \(\sigma (t)=G(0)\epsilon (t)+\int^{t}_{t_ 0}G(t-\tau)\epsilon (\tau)d\tau.\) The assumed functional space \(S_{\gamma}\), for \(\epsilon\) (t) is: \(\epsilon (t)\in L^ 2_{loc},\quad \int^{+\infty}_{0}| \epsilon (-s)|^ 2\exp (-2\gamma s)ds<+\infty,\) and the particular value considered for G(s) is \(1/2+1/2 \exp (-s).\) The author comes to the conclusion that for \(\gamma\leq 1/2\) the uniqueness theorem holds for the said integral equation (with \(t_ 0=-\infty)\). At the contrary for \(\gamma >1/2\) the theorem is not true.
0 references
Volterra integral equation
0 references
Banach space
0 references
Cauchy problem
0 references
Laplace operator
0 references
visco-elasticity
0 references