Interpreting the truncated pentagonal number theorem using partition pairs (Q491559): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claim: author (P16): Item:Q810573
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / author
 
Property / author: Louis Worthy Kolitsch / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 03:58, 21 February 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Interpreting the truncated pentagonal number theorem using partition pairs
scientific article

    Statements

    Interpreting the truncated pentagonal number theorem using partition pairs (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    26 August 2015
    0 references
    Summary: In 2012 \textit{G. E. Andrews} and \textit{M. Merca} [J. Comb. Theory, Ser. A 119, No. 8, 1639--1643 (2012; Zbl 1246.05014)] gave a new expansion for partial sums of Euler's pentagonal number series and expressed \[ \sum_{j=0}^{k-1}(-1)^j(p(n-j(3j+1)/2)-p(n-j(3j+5)/2-1))=(-1)^{k-1}M_k(n) \] where \(M_k(n)\) is the number of partitions of \(n\) where \(k\) is the least integer that does not occur as a part and there are more parts greater than \(k\) than there are less than \(k\). We show that \(M_k(n)=C_k(n)\) where \(C_k(n)\) is the number of partition pairs \((S, U)\) where \(S\) is a partition with parts greater than \(k\), \(U\) is a partition with \(k-1\) distinct parts all of which are greater than the smallest part in \(S\), and the sum of the parts in \(S \cup U\) is \(n\). We use partition pairs to determine what is counted by three similar expressions involving linear combinations of pentagonal numbers. Most of the results will be presented analytically and combinatorially.
    0 references
    partitions
    0 references
    Euler's pentagonal number theorem
    0 references
    partition pairs
    0 references

    Identifiers