What is wrong with the Hausdorff measure in Finsler spaces (Q2498838): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item. |
Removed claims |
||
Property / author | |||
Property / author: Juan Carlos Álvarez Paiva / rank | |||
Property / author | |||
Property / author: Gautier Berck / rank | |||
Revision as of 10:39, 21 February 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | What is wrong with the Hausdorff measure in Finsler spaces |
scientific article |
Statements
What is wrong with the Hausdorff measure in Finsler spaces (English)
0 references
16 August 2006
0 references
This paper advocates that the study of Finsler spaces be taken to a deeper level than usual. The reason for this examination is that when the Hausdorff measure is used in the definition of volume, then totally geodesic manifolds are not necessarily minimal. With another definition of volume by way of a Crofton formula, it is proved that the Holmes-Thompson measure is more suitable for deriving such results since totally geodesic hypersurfaces are minimally applied.
0 references
Finsler manifold
0 references
Hausdorff measure
0 references
minimal submanifolds
0 references
Holmes-Thompson volume
0 references