Partial triumph or total failure? (Q762044): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Henk J. M. Bos / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 07:43, 22 February 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Partial triumph or total failure?
scientific article

    Statements

    Partial triumph or total failure? (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1985
    0 references
    Three examples of incorrect or incomplete proofs by outstanding mathematicians are discussed. They are: Euler's proof (1749) of the fundamental theorem of algebra, Stieltjes' proof (1885) of the Riemann hypothesis and Appell's proof (1926) that Euler's constant is irrational. The author gives short modern versions of the arguments; in the first two cases he indicates where the proofs are wrong or incomplete, in the last case he leaves it to the reader to find out. (Appell also found out himself and retracted his proof within weeks.) He also speculates about the influence these ''proofs'' might have had, for example because they suggested ideas to other mathematicians. He draws no conclusions and ends the article thus: ''Perhaps in the final analysis, the significance of an idea depends on the imagination and creativity of those dealing with it.''
    0 references
    proofs
    0 references
    Stieltjes
    0 references
    Riemann hypothesis
    0 references
    Appell
    0 references
    Euler's constant
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references