Class number relation between type \((l,l, \dots,l)\) function fields over \(\mathbb{F}_ q (T)\) and their subfields (Q1895463): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item. |
Removed claim: reviewed by (P1447): Item:Q1251691 |
||
| Property / reviewed by | |||
| Property / reviewed by: K. Lakkis / rank | |||
Revision as of 23:07, 22 February 2024
scientific article
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Class number relation between type \((l,l, \dots,l)\) function fields over \(\mathbb{F}_ q (T)\) and their subfields |
scientific article |
Statements
Class number relation between type \((l,l, \dots,l)\) function fields over \(\mathbb{F}_ q (T)\) and their subfields (English)
0 references
16 July 1996
0 references
We quote the author's words: ``Let \(L/\mathbb{F}_q (T)\) be a tame abelian extension of type \((l,l, \dots,l)\). The ratio of the degree zero divisor class number (as well as the ideal class number) of \(L\) to the product of corresponding class numbers of all cyclic subfields of \(L\) is clearly determined''.
0 references
class number relation
0 references
function fields
0 references
tame abelian extension
0 references
