A logistic \(L\)-moment-based analog for the Tukey \(g-h\), \(g\), \(h\), and \(h-h\) system of distributions (Q1952666): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q58690331, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1708298810402 |
Changed an Item |
||
Property / describes a project that uses | |||
Property / describes a project that uses: LMOMENTS / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 13:03, 26 February 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | A logistic \(L\)-moment-based analog for the Tukey \(g-h\), \(g\), \(h\), and \(h-h\) system of distributions |
scientific article |
Statements
A logistic \(L\)-moment-based analog for the Tukey \(g-h\), \(g\), \(h\), and \(h-h\) system of distributions (English)
0 references
3 June 2013
0 references
Summary: This paper introduces a standard logistic \(L\)-moment-based system of distributions. The proposed system is an analog to the standard normal conventional moment-based Tukey \(g-h\), \(g\), \(h\) and \(h-h\) system of distributions. The system also consists of four classes of distributions and is referred to as (i) asymmetric \(\gamma-\kappa\), (ii) log-logistic \(\gamma\), (iii) symmetric \(\kappa\), and (iv) asymmetric \(\kappa_{\mathcal L}-\kappa_{\mathcal R}\). The system can be used in a variety of settings such as for the simulation or modeling of events -- most notably, when heavy-tailed distributions are of interest. A procedure is also described for simulating \(\gamma-\kappa\), \(\gamma\), \(\kappa\) and \(\kappa_{\mathcal L}-\kappa_{\mathcal R}\) distributions with specified \(L\)-moments and \(L\)-correlations. The Monte Carlo results presented in this study indicate that estimates of \(L\)-skew, \(L\)-kurtosis and \(L\)-correlation associated with the \(\gamma-\kappa\), \(\gamma\), \(\kappa\), and \(\kappa_{\mathcal L}-\kappa_{\mathcal R}\) distributions are substantially superior to their corresponding conventional product-moment estimators in terms of relative bias and relative standard error.
0 references