Approximate string matching with compressed indexes (Q1662494): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item. |
Removed claim: author (P16): Item:Q1746217 |
||
Property / author | |||
Property / author: Pedro Morales-Almazan / rank | |||
Revision as of 05:12, 29 February 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Approximate string matching with compressed indexes |
scientific article |
Statements
Approximate string matching with compressed indexes (English)
0 references
20 August 2018
0 references
Summary: A compressed full-text self-index for a text \(T\) is a data structure requiring reduced space and able to search for patterns \(P\) in \(T\). It can also reproduce any substring of \(T\), thus actually replacing \(T\). Despite the recent explosion of interest on compressed indexes, there has not been much progress on functionalities beyond the basic exact search. In this paper we focus on indexed approximate string matching (ASM), which is of great interest, say, in bioinformatics. We study ASM algorithms for Lempel-Ziv compressed indexes and for compressed suffix trees/arrays. Most compressed self-indexes belong to one of these classes. We start by adapting the classical method of partitioning into exact search to self-indexes, and optimize it over a representative of either class of self-index. Then, we show that a Lempel-Ziv index can be seen as an extension of the classical \(q\)-samples index. We give new insights on this type of index, which can be of independent interest, and then apply them to a Lempel-Ziv index. Finally, we improve hierarchical verification, a successful technique for sequential searching, so as to extend the matches of pattern pieces to the left or right. Most compressed suffix trees/arrays support the required bidirectionality, thus enabling the implementation of the improved technique. In turn, the improved verification largely reduces the accesses to the text, which are expensive in self-indexes. We show experimentally that our algorithms are competitive and provide useful space-time tradeoffs compared to classical indexes.
0 references
compressed index
0 references
approximate string matching
0 references
Lempel-Ziv index
0 references
compressed suffix tree
0 references
compressed suffix array
0 references