Is there always an extremal Teichmüller mapping? (Q2565889): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Martin Chuaqui Farrú / rank
Normal rank
 

Revision as of 08:15, 29 February 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Is there always an extremal Teichmüller mapping?
scientific article

    Statements

    Is there always an extremal Teichmüller mapping? (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    28 September 2005
    0 references
    Given a quasisymmetric self-homeomorphism \(h\) of the unit circle \(S^1\), let \(Q(h)\) be the set of all quasiconformal mappings with the correspondence \(h\). In ''Unique extremality'', [J. Anal. Math. 75, 299--338 (1998; Zbl 0929.30017)], by \textit{V. Božin, N. Lakic, V. Marković} and \textit{M. Mateljević}, it was shown that there exists \(h\) for which no extremal extension as a Teichmüller mapping is possible. This disproved some long standing conjectures. In the example constructed there, the boundary correspondence had a single extremal quasiconformal extension. In this paper we show that even when there are infinitely many quasiconformal extensions of the boundary values, it may still happen that none of them is a Teichmüller mapping. An infinitesimal version of this result is also established.
    0 references
    0 references
    quasisymmetric homeomorphism
    0 references
    quasiconformal mapping
    0 references
    boundary correspondence
    0 references
    extremal
    0 references
    Teichmüller mapping.
    0 references