Fixed-point error analysis of fast Hartley transform (Q802858): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Removed claim: reviewed by (P1447): Item:Q1793929 |
Changed an Item |
||
| Property / reviewed by | |||
| Property / reviewed by: Vítězslav Veselý / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Revision as of 10:59, 29 February 2024
scientific article
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Fixed-point error analysis of fast Hartley transform |
scientific article |
Statements
Fixed-point error analysis of fast Hartley transform (English)
0 references
1990
0 references
The authors analyse fixed-point error propagation for both decimation-in- frequency (DIF) and decimation-in-time (DIT) fast Hartley transform (FHT). Expressions for average output signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) are derived and plotted. A comparison with plots of analogical expressions for standard DIT and DIF fast Fourier transform (FFT) shows better performance of FFT (FHT exhibits lower SNR than FFT). Moreover, DIT FHT should be preferred over DIF FHT. The reasons explaining these results are discussed.
0 references
fixed-point error propagation
0 references
decimation-in-frequency
0 references
decimation-in- time
0 references
fast Hartley transform
0 references
average output signal-to-noise ratio
0 references
comparison
0 references
fast Fourier transform
0 references
performance
0 references
