Scattering and bound states in Euclidean lattice quantum field theories (Q5956811): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 23:48, 4 March 2024

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1713419
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Scattering and bound states in Euclidean lattice quantum field theories
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1713419

    Statements

    Scattering and bound states in Euclidean lattice quantum field theories (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    6 November 2002
    0 references
    The problem of asymptotic completeness (AC) is the question whether all pure states can be interpreted in terms of scattering states of particles. The authors study here the two-body AC in massive Euclidean lattice quantum field theories. Schwinger \(n\)-point functions \(S_n(x_1,\dots, x_n)\), \(x_i\in \mathbb{Z}^{d+1}\) with \(d\geq 1\), and Bethe-Salpeter kernel \(K(k,p,q)\) are defined. Let \({\mathfrak H}_{bs}\) be the space containing one-particle bound states, and \({\mathfrak H}^{2(m+\delta_0)}\) the space of the states having energy less than \(2(m+\delta_0)\). They propose the following four hypotheses: H1: Existence of ``one particle states'' (i.e. \(\widehat{S}_2(p_0,{\mathfrak p}))\). H2: \(K\) is analytic in \(|\operatorname {Im} p_i|< \delta_i+ \varepsilon\), \(|\operatorname {Im} q_i|< \delta_i+ \varepsilon\), \(|\operatorname {Im} k_0|< m+\delta_0\) for \(\delta_i> 0\) \((i=0,1,\dots, d)\) and \(\varepsilon>0\). H3: \(K= \eta 1+\eta^2 K_1(k,p,q)\) for \(\eta\geq 0\), and \(K_1\) satisfies H2. H4: \({\mathfrak H}^{2(m+\delta_0)}\) basically consists of ``two-particle states''. The following theorem is proved: Theorem. \({\mathfrak H}^{2(m+\delta_0)}= ({\mathfrak H}_{\text{in,out}} \oplus {\mathfrak H}_{bs})\cap{\mathfrak H}^{2(m+\delta_0)}\) holds under H1, B2, and H4. If in addition H3 holds, \({\mathfrak H}^{2(m+\delta_0)}= {\mathfrak H}_{\text{in,out}}\cap {\mathfrak H}^{2(m+\delta_0)}\). The condition \(d=1\) makes the proof constructive.
    0 references
    asymptotic completeness
    0 references
    Schwinger \(n\)-point functions
    0 references
    Bethe-Salpeter kernel
    0 references
    bound states
    0 references

    Identifiers