Prescribed subintegral extensions of local Noetherian domains (Q392448): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 01:09, 5 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Prescribed subintegral extensions of local Noetherian domains
scientific article

    Statements

    Prescribed subintegral extensions of local Noetherian domains (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    14 January 2014
    0 references
    An extension of (commutative) rings \(R \subseteq S\) is subintegral if it is integral, the contraction mapping \(\mathrm{Spec}(S)\longrightarrow\mathrm{Spec}(R)\) is a bijection and the induced maps on residue field extensions are isomorphisms. In this article the author worked out some of the local algebra for a special class of subintegral extensions of Noetherian rings developed in [\textit{B. Olberding}, J. Algebra 365, 199--221 (2012; Zbl 1262.13031)], with the goal of showing how given a local Noetherian ring \(S\), a subintegral extension \(R \subseteq S\) can be found with prescribed invariants. In particular, he considered invariants such as reduction number, Hilbert function, multiplicity, and local cohomology, for ideals \(I\) in subintegral extensions \(R \subseteq S\) of Noetherian rings with the property that \(I\) is contracted from \(S\), i.e., \( I = IS \cap R\). The construction behaves analytically like Nagata idealization but rather than a ring extension of \(S\), it produces a subring \(R\) of \(S\) such that \(R \subseteq S\) is subintegral.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    Hilbert function
    0 references
    Nagata idealization
    0 references
    Noetherian rings
    0 references
    reduction number
    0 references
    subintegral extensions
    0 references