A lower bound on the vertices of Specht modules for symmetric groups. (Q403027): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Changed an Item |
Set profile property. |
||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 00:10, 5 March 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | A lower bound on the vertices of Specht modules for symmetric groups. |
scientific article |
Statements
A lower bound on the vertices of Specht modules for symmetric groups. (English)
0 references
29 August 2014
0 references
This paper is a contribution to the modular representation theory of the symmetric groups, and in particular the study of the Specht modules, which continue to attract a great deal of attention. The problem studied here is the determination of the \textit{vertices} of Specht modules: recall that a vertex of a module \(M\) for a finite group \(G\) is a minimal subgroup \(P\) of \(G\) with the property that there is a module \(V\) for \(P\) such that the induced module \(V{\uparrow}^G\) has \(M\) as a direct summand. Finding the vertices of modules is in general very difficult and provides interesting information about modules. The author considers a Specht module \(S^\lambda\) for \(\mathfrak S_n\), and constructs a (typically quite large) subgroup of \(\mathfrak S_n\) which is necessarily contained in some vertex of \(S^\lambda\) (vertices are unique up to conjugacy, so the word `some' here imposes an insignificant restriction). Specifically, given a \(\lambda\)-tableau \(t\), the author constructs a group \(H(t)\times H(t')\), which may be simply described as the set of permutations under which any two entries in the same row of \(t\) are mapped to entries in the same row and any two entries in the same column of \(t\) are mapped to entries in the same column. The main theorem states that there is a vertex of \(S^\lambda\) containing a Sylow \(p\)-subgroup of \(H(t)\times H(t')\). The paper concludes with an observation that in a certain special case (for hook partitions of size not divisible by \(p\)) this bound is achieved. The paper is very well written, giving a very clear and concise summary of the necessary background before proving the main result efficiently. I hope to see more papers on this subject from this author.
0 references
representations of symmetric groups
0 references
modular representations
0 references
Specht modules
0 references
vertices
0 references
hook partitions
0 references