Convergence of polynomial ergodic averages of several variables for some commuting transformations (Q610628): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 01:45, 5 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Convergence of polynomial ergodic averages of several variables for some commuting transformations
scientific article

    Statements

    Convergence of polynomial ergodic averages of several variables for some commuting transformations (English)
    0 references
    8 December 2010
    0 references
    Let \(T_1,\dots, T_l\) be commuting invertible measure preserving transformations on the probability space \((X,{\mathcal B},\mu)\). The main theorem of this article is: Theorem 1.3. Let \((T_1,\dots, T_l)\) be a totally ergodic generating set, and let \(p_{ij}: \mathbb{Z}^d\to \mathbb{Z}\) for \(1\leq i\leq r\), \(1\leq j\leq l\) be polynomials. For any \(f_1,\dots, f_r\in L^\infty(\mu)\) and any Følner sequences \(\{\Phi_N\}^\infty_{N=1}\) in \(\mathbb{Z}^d\), the averages \[ {1\over|\Phi_N|} \sum_{u\in \Phi_N}\,\prod^r_{i=1} f_i(T^{p_{i1}(n)}_1\cdots T^{p_{il}(n)}x) \] converges in \(L^2(\mu)\) as \(N\to\infty\). Here, we call \((T_1,\dots, T_l)\) a totally ergodic generating set if \(T^{c_1}_1\cdots T^{c_l}_l\) is ergodic for any choice of \((c_1,\dots, c_l)\neq (0,\dots,0)\), and a sequence of finite subsets \(\{(\Phi_N\}^\infty_{N=1}\) of a countable discrete group \(G\) is a Følner sequence if for all \(g\in G\), \[ \lim_{n\to \infty} {|g\Phi_n \Delta\Phi_n|\over |\Phi_n|}= 0, \] where \(\Delta\) is the symmetric difference of operators. The main theorem is a consequence of the following proposition. Proposition 2.10. Let \((T_1,\dots, T_l)\) be a totally ergodic generating set, and \(P= \{p_{ij}: \mathbb{Z}^d\to\mathbb{Z}\) for \(1\leq i\leq r\), \(1\leq j\leq l\}\) be an ED-set of polynomials. Then there exists \(k\in\mathbb{N}\) such that for any \(f_1,\dots, f_r\in L^\infty(\mu)\) with \(|||f_m|||_k= )\) for some \(1\leq m\leq r\), we have \[ \limsup_{N\to\infty}\,\Biggl\|{1\over |\Phi_N|} \sum_{u\in \Phi_N}\,\Biggl(\prod^r_{i=1} T^{p_{i1}(n)}_1\cdots T^{p_{il}(n)}_l f_i\Biggr)\Biggr\|_{L^2(\mu)}= 0 \] for any Følner sequence \(\{\Phi_N\}^\infty_{N=1}\) in \(\mathbb{Z}^d\). Here, \(P= \{p_{ij}: \mathbb{Z}^d\to\mathbb{Z}\) for \(1\leq i\leq r\), \(1\leq j\leq l\}\) be an ED-set if all of the following hold: 1. Each \(p_{ij}\) in \(P\) is not equal to a nonzero constant. 2. No two polynomials \(p_{i_1,j}\), \(p_{i_2,j}\) in \(P\) differ by a nonzero constant for any \(j= 1,\dots,l\). 3. For each \(i= 1,\dots, r\), there is some \(j\in\{1,\dots,l\}\), where \(p_{ij}\) is nonzero. The norm \(|||\cdots|||_k\) is defined as follows. Let \(\mu^{[k]}_T\) be an invariant probability measure on \(X^{2^k}\) with respect to \(T^{2^k}\) defined inductively. \(\mu^{[0]}_T= \mu\) and let \({\mathcal I}^{[k]}_T\) be the \(\sigma\)-algebra of \(T^{[k]}\) of \(X^{2^k}\), and \(\mu^{[k+1]}_T= \mu^{[k]}_T\times_{{\mathcal I}^{[k]}_k} T^{[k]}\) to be the relatively independent square of \(\mu^{[k]}_T\) over \({\mathcal I}^{[k]}_T\). Then for \(f\in L^\infty(\mu)\), \[ |||f|||^{2^k}_k= \int_{X^{2^k}}\,\prod^{2^k- 1}_{j=0} f(x_j)\,d\mu^{[k]}_T(x). \] They use PET induction introduced by Bergelson for the proof of Proposition 2.10.
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers