Galois invariance of local root numbers (Q652254): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 00:53, 5 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Galois invariance of local root numbers
scientific article

    Statements

    Galois invariance of local root numbers (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    14 December 2011
    0 references
    Using results of Fröhlich-Queyrut, Martinet, and Serre, it is shown that under appropriate hypothesis the local root number \(W(\rho,\psi)\) attached to a representation \(\rho\) of the Weil-Deligne group \(\text{WD}(\overline{F}/F)\) of a \(p\)-adic field \(F\) is invariant under Galois conjugation of the coefficients of the representation. In more detail, let \(\iota\) be any element of \(\Aut\mathbb C\). Proposition 4 asserts that if \(\rho\) is a representation of the Weil group \(W(\overline{F}/F)\), then: (i) If \(\rho\) is essentially self-dual and \(\det\rho\) is essentially trivial then \(W(\rho,\psi)\) is \(\pm 1\) and independent of \(\psi\). (ii) If \(\rho\) is essentially self-dual then so is the conjugate \(\rho^\iota\). (iii) If \(\rho\) is essentially self-dual and dim \(\rho\) is even, if det\(\rho\) is essentially trivial then so is det \(\rho^\iota\). Then (iv) If \(\rho\) is essentially self-dual, \(\dim\rho\) is even, and \(\det\rho\) is essentially trivial then \(W(\rho^\iota,\psi)\) is \(\pm 1\) and independent of \(\psi\). Assume that \(\rho\) is essentially self-dual and det\(\rho\) is essentially trivial. Then we can write \(W(\rho)\) for \(W(\rho,\psi)\). Theorem 1 asserts that if \(\rho\) is also of odd weight and even dimension, then \(W(\rho^\iota)=W(\rho)\). Three examples following Theorem 1 show that the requirements that \(\dim\rho\) be even, that \(\det\rho\) is essentially trivial, and that the weight is odd, cannot be omitted. Proposition 12 and Theorem 2 are generalizations to the context of Weil-Deligne groups. Of course \(\psi\) is a nontrivial unitary character of \(F\) into \(\mathbb C^\times\), and not into \(\mathbb C\) as written on page 987, line before \((2.3)\), but otherwise the exposition in this paper is exemplary.
    0 references
    Local root number
    0 references
    Galois invariance
    0 references
    local fields
    0 references
    Weil group
    0 references
    Weil-Deligne group
    0 references
    \(\varepsilon\)-factors
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references