Are there convenient subcategories of Top? (Q793141): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 01:15, 5 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Are there convenient subcategories of Top?
scientific article

    Statements

    Are there convenient subcategories of Top? (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1983
    0 references
    Nine convenience properties for topological categories are defined in terms of certain types of epi-sinks being preserved under certain types of pullbacks. One of the properties is Cartesian closure, and the strongest corresponds to the concrete quasitopoi of \textit{E. J. Dubuc} [Applications of sheaves, Proc. Res. Symp., Durham 1977, Lect. Notes Math. 753, 239-254 (1979; Zbl 0423.18006)]. With respect to seven of the properties, every non-trivial topological subcategory of TOP is as convenient or inconvenient as TOP itself. For these subcategories, the other two properties are equivalent to Cartesian closure. An interesting deficiency of all Cartesian closed topological subcategories of TOP is exhibited.
    0 references
    convenience properties
    0 references
    epi-sinks
    0 references
    pullbacks
    0 references
    Cartesian closure
    0 references
    concrete quasitopoi
    0 references
    topological subcategory of TOP
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references