On the existence of symplectic resolutions of symplectic reductions (Q971912): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Changed an Item
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 02:46, 5 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On the existence of symplectic resolutions of symplectic reductions
scientific article

    Statements

    On the existence of symplectic resolutions of symplectic reductions (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    17 May 2010
    0 references
    The author studies the existence of symplectic resolutions of the symplectic reduction of a coregular representation of \(\mathrm{Sl}_{2}\). If \(G\) is any semisimple complex linear algebraic group and \(V\) is a finite dimensional complex vector space on which \(G\) acts, then \(V\oplus V^{*}\) has a natural symplectic form and \(G\) acts symplectically on it. The moment map \(\mu:(V\oplus V^{*})^{\oplus 2}\longrightarrow\mathfrak{g}^{*}\), where \(\mathfrak{g}=\mathrm{Lie}(G)\), is a \(G-\)equivariant map, hence \(\mu^{-1}(0)\subseteq (V\oplus V^{*})^{\oplus 2}\) is a \(G-\)invariant subset. The quotient \((V\oplus V^{*})///G:=\mu^{-1}(0)//G\) is the symplectic reduction of \(V\oplus V^{*}\). If \(\mathcal{I}_{\mu}\) is the ideal corresponding to \(\mu^{-1}(0)\), then \((V\oplus V^{*})///G\) is isomorphic as schemes to \(\mathrm{Spec}(\mathbb{C}[V\oplus V^{*}]/\mathcal{I}_{\mu})^{G}\). It is not necessarily a symplectic variety, but it is if \(\mu^{-1}(0)\) is normal, the stabilizer of every regular point of \(\mu^{-1}(0)\) is trivial, and \((\mu^{-1}(0)_{\mathrm{sing}}//G)\subseteq ((V\oplus V^{*})///G)_{\mathrm{sing}}\) (see Section 2). Suppose that \(G=\mathrm{Sl}_{2}\) and that the representation \(V\) is coregular, i. e. the quotient \(V//G\) is smooth. Coregular representations for simple, connected and simply connected groups are classified by \textit{G. W. Schwarz} [Invent. Math. 50, 1--12 (1978; Zbl 0391.20033)], and for \(\mathrm{Sl}_{2}\) there are only the following cases: (1) \(\mathbb{C}^{2}\), \(\mathbb{C}^{2}\oplus\mathbb{C}^{2}\) and \(\mathbb{C}^{2}\oplus\mathbb{C}^{2}\oplus\mathbb{C}^{2}\); (2) \(S^{3}\mathbb{C}^{2}\) and \(S^{4}\mathbb{C}^{2}\); (3) \(\mathfrak{sl}_{2}\) and \(\mathfrak{sl}^{\oplus 2}_{2}\); (4) \(\mathfrak{sl}_{2}\oplus\mathbb{C}^{2}\). The case (1) is treated in section 3: the author shows that \(\mathbb{C}^{2}\oplus\mathbb{C}^{2}///\mathrm{Sl}_{2}\) is non-reduced, hence it is not a symplectic variety, while \((\mathbb{C}^{2}\oplus\mathbb{C}^{2})^{\oplus 2}///\mathrm{Sl}_{2}\) is the union of two normal components, each admitting a symplectic resolution. Finally, \((\mathbb{C}^{2}\oplus\mathbb{C}^{2})^{\oplus 3}///\mathrm{Sl}_{2}\) is a symplectic variety which is isomorphic to the subscheme of \(\mathfrak{so}_{6}\) of matrices \(A\) such that \(A^{2}=0\) and \(\mathrm{Pf}(QA)=0\), where \(\mathrm{Pf}(QA)\) is the Pfaffian of the 15 skew-symmetric \(4\times 4-\)minors of \(A\). This corresponds to the closure of the nilpotent orbit \(\mathcal{O}_{[2^{2},1^{2}]}\), which is singular at the origin, and which admits two symplectic resolution: one by the cotangent bundle, and one by its dual. The method is to study the action of \(\mathrm{Sp}_{2n}\) on \((\mathbb{C}^{2n})^{\oplus 2m}\): the author gives a criterion for reducedness and normality of \(\mu^{-1}(0)\), and describes the quotient \(\mu^{-1}(0)//\mathrm{Sl}_{2}\) as the scheme \(Z\) of matrices \(A\in\mathfrak{so}_{2m}\) such that \(A^{2}=0\) and \(\mathrm{rk}(A)\leq \min\{2n,m\}\), with the reduced structure. Using the natural action of \(SO_{2m}\) on \(Z\), then \(Z\) is given by union of closures of nilpotent orbits. By \textit{B. Fu} [Invent. Math. 151, No. 1, 167--186 (2003; Zbl 1072.14058)], the author guarantees the existence of symplectic resolutions. The cases (2) and (3) are classical: \((S^{3}\mathbb{C}^{2}\oplus S^{2}\mathbb{C}^{2})///\mathrm{Sl}_{2}\simeq\mathbb{C}^{2}/(\mathbb{Z}/4)\) is a symplectic variety having an \(A_{3}-\)singularity at \(\{0\}\), which can be resolved symplectically by two successive blow-ups, while \((S^{4}\mathbb{C}^{2}\oplus S^{4}\mathbb{C}^{2})///\mathrm{Sl}_{2}\) is a symplectic variety isomorphic to a subset of \((\mathbb{C}^{2})^{\oplus 3}/S_{3}\), which can be resolved symplectically by the Hilbert scheme \(\mathrm{Hilb}^{3}(\mathbb{C}^{2})\). The case \(\mathfrak{sl}_{2}^{\oplus 2}///Sl_{2}\) gives a symplectic variety with an \(A_{1}-\)singularity at the origin, which can be resolved by a single blow-up. The case \(\mathfrak{sl}_{2}^{\oplus 4}///\mathrm{Sl}_{2}\) is a symplectic variety isomorphic to the subscheme of \(\mathfrak{sp}_{4}\) of matrices \(A\in\mathfrak{sp}_{4}\) such that \(A^{2}=0\). By \textit{M. Lehn} and \textit{C. Sorger} [J. Algebr. Geom. 15, No. 4, 753--770 (2006; Zbl 1156.14030)], the cotangent bundle gives a symplectic resolution. The case (5) is the last treated. First, the author computes the invariant ring \(\mathbb{C}[\mathfrak{sl}_{2}\oplus\mathbb{C}^{2}]^{\mathrm{Sl}_{2}}\), the generating invariants of the action of \(\mathrm{Sl}_{2}\) on \((\mathfrak{sl}_{2}\oplus\mathbb{C}^{2})^{\oplus 2}\) (Propositions 5.1 and 5.2) and the ideal \(\mathcal{I}_{\mu}\). Using \texttt{Singular}, in Proposition 5.3 it is shown that \(\mathbb{C}[\mu^{-1}(0)]^{\mathrm{Sl}_{2}}\simeq \mathbb{C}[z_{1},\dots,z_{8}]/(h_{1},\dots,h_{9})\), and a precise expression of the polynomials \(h_{1},\dots,h_{9}\) is given. Hence \(\mu^{-1}(0)//\mathrm{Sl}_{2}\) is a subvariety \(Z\) of \(\mathbb{C}^{8}\) whose ideal is \(V(h_{1},\dots,h_{9})\). Then the author shows that \(Z\) is a \(4-\)dimensional symplectic variety with a stratification \(\{0\}\subseteq Z_{\mathrm{sing}}\subseteq Z\), where \(Z_{\mathrm{sing}}\) is the singular locus of \(Z\) and \(\{0\}\) is the singular point of \(Z_{\mathrm{sing}}\). The blow-up \(\widetilde{Z}\) of \(Z\) along \(Z_{\mathrm{sing}}\) is a symplectic resolution of \(Z\). The interesting phenomenon pointed out by the author is that \(\pi^{-1}(0)\) is the union \(E_{1}\cup E_{2}\) of two projective planes intersecting at one point. One can then perform a Mukai flop in \(E_{1}\) or in \(E_{2}\): the author shows using \texttt{Singular} that the two obtained Mukai flops \(W_{1}\) and \(W_{2}\) are two symplectic resolutions of \(Z\) which are not isomorphic (and each one is not isomorphic to \(\widetilde{Z}\)), but which are equivalent in the sense of \textit{B. Fu} and \textit{Y. Namikawa} [Ann. Inst. Fourier 54, No. 1, 1--19 (2004; Zbl 1063.14018)].
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references