Polarized mixed Hodge structures: On irrationality of threefolds via degeneration (Q1066971): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 03:04, 5 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Polarized mixed Hodge structures: On irrationality of threefolds via degeneration
scientific article

    Statements

    Polarized mixed Hodge structures: On irrationality of threefolds via degeneration (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1984
    0 references
    The author considers smooth complex projective varieties X of dimension 3 with \(\pi_ 1(X)=0\), \(h^ i({\mathcal O}_ X)=0\) for \(i=1,2,3\) and \(H^ 3(X,{\mathbb{Z}})\) torsion free. A one-parameter degeneration \({\mathcal X}\to \Delta\) of such varieties gives rise to a degenerating family of abelian varieties with principal polarization over \(\Delta\), obtained by considering the intermediate jacobians of the fibers. By comparison with the analogous situation for curves one obtains necessary conditions for the generic fiber to be rational. The case is considered where the special fiber \(X_ 0\) is a union \(D_ 0\cup D_ 1\cup D_ 2\) of smooth divisors with normal crossings such that \(D_ 1(D_ i\cap D_ j)=0\) for \(i\neq j\). The special fiber of the family is then an extension of \(\oplus J^ 3(D_ i)\) by a torus \(\tau\). The character group of \(\tau\) is then equipped with a skew-symmetric integral bilinear form \(\psi\). In the analogous curve case, \(\psi\) is known. By showing in explicit examples that \(\psi\) is different from the curve case, one shows that the generic fiber \(X_ t\) is not rational. This works for cubic and quartic threefolds, complete intersections of type (2,3) in \({\mathbb{P}}^ 5\) or (2,2,2) in \({\mathbb{P}}^ 6\), the quartic double solid and hypersurfaces of bidegree (p,3), \(p\geq 2\), in \({\mathbb{P}}^ 1\times {\mathbb{P}}^ 3.\) The proof of proposition 1.9.2 of the paper contains a gap, which can be filled, as the author told me.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    irrationality
    0 references
    polarized mixed Hodge structure
    0 references
    smooth complex
    0 references
    projective 3-fold
    0 references
    degenerating family of abelian varieties with principal
    0 references
    polarization
    0 references
    degenerating family of abelian varieties with principal polarization
    0 references