Experiments with implicit upwind methods for the Euler equations (Q1069788): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Changed an Item |
Set profile property. |
||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 02:07, 5 March 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Experiments with implicit upwind methods for the Euler equations |
scientific article |
Statements
Experiments with implicit upwind methods for the Euler equations (English)
0 references
1985
0 references
A number of implicit integration schemes for the one-dimensional Euler equations with conservative upwind spatial differencing are tested on a problem of steady discontinuous flow. Fastest convergence (quadratic for the first-order ''backward Euler'' scheme) is obtained with the upwind switching provided by the second author's differentiable split fluxes [in: Lect. Notes Phys. 170 (1982; Zbl 0543.76001) on pp. 507-512], which easily linearize in time. With \textit{P. L. Roe}'s [J. Comput. Phys. 43, 357-372 (1981; Zbl 0474.65066)] nondifferentiable split flux-differences the iterations may get trapped in a limit-cycle. This also happens in a second-order scheme with split fluxes, if the matrix coefficients arising in the implicit time-linearization are not properly centered in space. The use of second-order terms computed from split fluxes degrades the accuracy of the solution, especially if these are subjected to a limiter for the sake of monotonicity preservation. Second-order terms computed from the characteristic variables perform best.
0 references
one-dimensional model of isothermal flow in a spiral galaxy
0 references
strong shock
0 references
implicit integration schemes
0 references
one-dimensional Euler equations
0 references
conservative upwind spatial differencing
0 references
steady discontinuous flow
0 references
convergence
0 references
differentiable split fluxes
0 references
nondifferentiable split flux- differences
0 references
limit-cycle
0 references
second-order scheme
0 references
implicit time- linearization
0 references
accuracy
0 references
monotonicity preservation
0 references